She could be wrong. God knows she’s been wrong on a heckuva lot.
That’s why I say it should be investigated.
Why shouldn’t it be investigated? We’re talking about potential federal crimes and treason on the part of Obama if Onaka (who has been working with public health records over 40 years, starting before 1968) is right on what he told Okubo about this basic, routine office procedure. Why is this not worth investigating? Is treason no big deal to you?
Because they have better things to do than try to satisfy your personal curiosity regarding an issue they consider settled?
Because no one with any authority or legal clout agrees that there is any basis for your claims?
Because to those with access to the actual records it's pretty plain that you are chasing phantoms?