Lucas Smith is a con-man who tried to scam money first and foremost and has put effectively zero effort into anything that could even remotely challenge BHO while focusing his efforts on trying to enrich himself.
Orly Taitz is a self-aggranizing nut who managed to single handledly poison the well for everyone who wanted the issue taken seriously.
You have no evidence. You only have what you want to think is evidence alongside an almost pathological rejection of anything that doesn't support your point of view.
Er, Butter is one of two or three people who, even if I were a staunch “anti-birther,” would command my respect because of the depth and honesty of their research. You should take a look at it yourself before dismissing it.
Why does the Factcheck COLB have a higher number than the Nordyke BC’s even though it claims to have received that number 3 days earlier than theirs?
That’s not a perceived anomaly; that is a real anomaly, based on what the HDOH itself has said. So explain that anomaly to me. Tell me what happened, to create that result.
If this was an episode of CSI the case would already be solved. But all I have asked for is an investigation because of the incompatible claims and because of the laws and rules documentably broken in this whole process.
The standard of evidence you seem to be expecting is that if the killer doesn’t come forward out of the goodness of his heart and tell the whole world that he committed the crime, then all you have are “suspicions, allegations and accustions based on perceived anomalies and your interpretations of people’s comment. Not proof.”
Apply that standard everywhere in your life and you’ll be left spinning in the middle of the room wondering which direction is up.