He faces the charge of disobeying a lawful order.
He is not being allowed to show that the order he was given was not lawful because it is - as the elements of Article 92 say - “contrary to the Constitution”.
Lakin’s due process and equal protection rights are being trampled. This is officially a banana republic.
True.
He is not being allowed to show that the order he was given was not lawful because it is - as the elements of Article 92 say - contrary to the Constitution.
There is no Constitutional question about the orders he's charged with disobeying.
Lakins due process and equal protection rights are being trampled. This is officially a banana republic.
Not even close to being true.