Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

He faces the charge of disobeying a lawful order.

He is not being allowed to show that the order he was given was not lawful because it is - as the elements of Article 92 say - “contrary to the Constitution”.

Lakin’s due process and equal protection rights are being trampled. This is officially a banana republic.


56 posted on 12/01/2010 12:44:44 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
He faces the charge of disobeying a lawful order.

True.

He is not being allowed to show that the order he was given was not lawful because it is - as the elements of Article 92 say - “contrary to the Constitution”.

There is no Constitutional question about the orders he's charged with disobeying.

Lakin’s due process and equal protection rights are being trampled. This is officially a banana republic.

Not even close to being true.

69 posted on 12/01/2010 2:44:05 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson