So far as I know, there has never been another time when multiple members of the military (retired)...let alone one member, has charged a sitting "CinC" with treason. It's unprecedented.
Those guys who charged Barry with treason could be brought up on mutiny charges. Why haven't they? Because Barry (& Holder) can't touch them! Otherwise, they would then (I should say "should") be allowed discovery during their trial.
The military must be assured they have a legal chain of command reaching up to and including the Commander in Chief. As you know, Officers like Lakin swear their oaths to the Constitution, not a person like Barry.
Well, I'm one, and so is that D-bag Chuck Swift. So believing someone just because they're a Boat School grad is going to twist you up into some pretty nasty contradictions.
So far as I know, there has never been another time when multiple members of the military (retired)...let alone one member, has charged a sitting "CinC" with treason. It's unprecedented.
First, I guess you must have missed all those nutbags, including some former military folk, who accused Bush of treason for supposedly being responsible for 9/11. If you did, here's just one of many links you can try:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/tag/treason/
Second, I don't see anything in the Constitution disqualifying a sitting President simply because some retired military people think he's a traitor. If that was the case, I suppose people should have refused to obey Bush's orders based on the accusations by some military people that he was responsible for 9/11.