Do you see how you are going to great lengths to find reasons to reject anything that doesn't support your suppositions? Such as focusing on a few photos that lend themselves to misinterpretation while ignoring photos that do not.
This is likely at least one reason why you never feel like you are getting anywhere. Anything you learn that doesn't support your presumptions is rejected, attributed to either conspiracy or corruption or perhaps taken as proof that you are being actively opposed in your efforts rather than that you are simply mistaken.
At this rate, why should anyone take you seriously when you say that if only you were to get this next thus-and-so you'd be satisfied if it wasn't in your favor?
You think I’m grasping at straws because I’m looking at what Factcheck actually posted?
I have an evidence-based epistemology and I don’t see that changing any time soon.
What photos am I ignoring?