You don’t seem to be listening to what I’m saying. What is observable on the Factcheck images is not reproducible in real life. There is no other angle that could produce the exact left-side edge shown on the Factcheck image. Every time you have the page so that the left-side edge looks like the Factcheck image, you get the same image of the folded “seal” - and it doesn’t look like what Factcheck has. The shape of the circle on the top fold is reproducible every time. The shape on the “authenticating seal” is never reproducible.
In science that’s definitive. If a result can’t be reproduced under identical variables, there’s a problem with that “result”.
Regarding the sampling of BC#’s, all I’ve ever used that for is to show that the numbers go up rather than down. That’s all the degree of precision that I was looking for. BC#’s from early in the year have low numbers, BC#s from the end of the year have high numbers. That’s all I was using those numbers for.
The numbers being serial is stated in the CDC’s Natality Report, and HI law requires that HI BC’s conform to the standards of the CDC. And the Nordyke BC’s are numbered serially, one right after the other.
You couldn't do it so it can't be done?
In science that's not definitive. It simply means that you couldn't do it.
So how do explain the other photos from that same session that clearly show the seal?