Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NLPC Alleges Rangel Illegally Used Leadership PAC Funds for Legal Defense (FEC complaint filed)
National Legal & Policy Center ^ | November 30, 2010 | Ken Boehm

Posted on 11/30/2010 8:37:19 AM PST by jazusamo

 

Rangel photoNLPC yesterday filed a Complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging that Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) violated the Federal Election Campaign Act by using almost $400,000 in funds from his National Leadership PAC to pay legal bills related to the House Ethics Committee actions against him. The Committee yesterday referred a censure resolution to the entire House after earlier this month finding Rangel guilty of violating House rules on 11 counts. Click here to download an 11-page pdf of the Complaint.

As the Complaint points out:

Members of Congress may use funds from their personal re-election committees for legal expenses related to their official actions. The National Leadership PAC is not Rangel's re-election committee but what is classified as a "leadership PAC," the purpose of which is make contributions to other candidates.

The Complaint cites an FEC rule that states:

To the extent that leadership PACs are used to pay for costs that could or should otherwise be paid for by the authorized committee, such payments are in-kind contributions, subject to the Act’s contribution limits and reporting requirements.

Thus, payments for legal fees by the National Leadership PAC should have been limited to $5,000. The National Leadership PAC paid $293,000 to the law firm of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP in the 2009-10 election cycle. It also paid $100,000 to the firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe on January 5, 2009 for the services of Democratic fix-it man Lanny Davis.

Rangel’s ability to pay for high-priced legal help allowed him to delay Ethics Committee action for more than two years and push his trial past the election. When he was not attacking NLPC during his August 11 speech on the House floor, Rangel said that his legal expenses totaled two million. According to Federal Election Commission filings, Rangel paid $1.65 million to lawyers from his re-election fund, in addition to the money from his leadership PAC.

Rangel’s illegal use of leadership PAC funds for his legal defense was first raised by Politico reporter John Bresnahan in August 2009. Rangel’s spokesman told Bresnahan that since the National Leadership PAC was headquartered in one of Rangel’s rent-controlled apartments, it was therefore involved in the Ethics Committee investigation.

Our Complaint addresses this assertion:

The apparent “loophole” relied upon by Rep. Rangel that any payment by National Leadership PAC was for its own legal defense is not credible because the House of Representatives has no jurisdiction over the PAC’s actions.  Moreover, the allegations which were central to the investigation and House proceeding’s barely touch on the actions of National Leadership PAC as only a minor part of one of the thirteen allegations in the Statement of Alleged Violation.  Through this pretext, in 2010 Rangel’s PAC paid more legal fees ($293,000) to Zuckerman, Spaeder LLP than did Rangel for Congress which is quite remarkable since the law firm barely mentioned National Leadership PAC in their 32-page written response to the Committee on Official Standard’s Statement of Alleged Violation.

NLPC played a key role in exposing Rangel’s corruption. In August 2008, NLPC sent a staff member to the Dominican Republic who confirmed that Rangel’s beachfront villa was being rented out even though Rangel reported no rent on his financial disclosure forms. The controversy over Rangel’s tax evasion led to more far-reaching scrutiny of Rangel’s finances, resulting in Rangel amending his financial disclosure forms in August 2009 to show several hundred thousand dollars in previously unreported assets and income.

In November 2008, NLPC President Peter Flaherty took photographs and made audio recordings at a Rangel-led junket on the Caribbean island of St. Maarten funded by Citigroup and other big corporations. In March, the Ethics Committee admonished Rangel for accepting corporate-funded travel, prompting his resignation from the Ways and Means chairmanship.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; ethics; leadershippacfunds; legalbills; nlpc; rangel
Rangel's problems don't seem to be over yet.
1 posted on 11/30/2010 8:37:26 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

He belongs in prison.


2 posted on 11/30/2010 8:51:43 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Amen to that...He’s been corrupt for so long he thinks he’s entitled to any illegal perk that comes along. In my book the only thing he’s entitled to is a federal slammer.


3 posted on 11/30/2010 8:56:35 AM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I am becoming discouraged. More and more on the Rule of Law being damned.

Rangel does belong in prison for the rest of his life. Ordinary citizen vs government official and ordinary citizen doesn't stand a chance when committing these types of crimes.

Maybe I should look at this another way. Maybe (even though I am not criminally inclined) I should run for a government office. No ... no run for office for me! Now I'm discouraged again.

I guess expecting Honest and Law Abiding from our elected is out with the bath water.....(frown).

4 posted on 11/30/2010 9:02:51 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Bless and Protect Our Men and Women in Uniform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Yes, he does.


5 posted on 11/30/2010 9:04:10 AM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

You’re right, it’s a shame that so many people have come to the point they don’t care that many elected to office are corrupt at the very least and hardened criminals at the worst. I suppose it reflects to some degree that morals have really taken a hit in the country.


6 posted on 11/30/2010 9:13:03 AM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Thank you for your comments.....
You are most kind.

I am a nobody, who prays a lot.
May God never turn his back on us,
Lord, we need you more than ever,
Please hear us Lord, please.
Amen.

7 posted on 11/30/2010 9:24:21 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Bless and Protect Our Men and Women in Uniform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson