Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NAMMO Signs a New Development Contract for Ammunition for the F35 Lightning II
Yahoo Marketwire ^ | 11/28/2010 | Yahoo Marketwire

Posted on 11/29/2010 2:08:11 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Nammo Raufoss AS and the Norwegian Defence Logistics Organisation (NDLO) have signed a contract on the final development and qualification of 25 mm APEX ammunition and associated training ammunition adapted to the F35 Fighter.

The contract is worth up to NOK 66 million and Nammo will also be providing capital in the amount of NOK 22 million. The contract will be completed by the end of 2012.

Several decades' experience in technology Nammo has a long background in the development of aircraft ammunition. Over the last 40 years, both Norwegian and allied fighters have used aircraft ammunition manufactured at Raufoss.

The newly developed APEX ammunition is based on Nammo's technological know- how, as well as several years' experience in the development and manufacture of aircraft ammunition. As early as 2005, Nammo started developing APEX in collaboration with the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment.

Must satisfy extremely high technical requirements Technical requirements for aircraft ammunition have grown increasingly demanding and APEX has been especially developed to meet such requirements.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aviation; avionics; f35; jsf; norway

1 posted on 11/29/2010 2:08:16 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

I still say it should have been named the “Crusader II.”


2 posted on 11/29/2010 2:11:56 PM PST by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

intersting, i wish they had gone into a little more about exactly what it is that makes the ammo so exacting. what does aircraft ammo do that other types dont?


3 posted on 11/29/2010 2:12:52 PM PST by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000
what does aircraft ammo do that other types dont?

Penetrate inches of steel armor for one. Some types are 'spin armed' to explode after a certain number of revolutions, too. They ain't cheap.

4 posted on 11/29/2010 2:16:56 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat
Agreed!


5 posted on 11/29/2010 2:22:05 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 677 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

oh. i guess it will be a while before my local wallmart carries it then.


6 posted on 11/29/2010 2:22:32 PM PST by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

since we’re out of Crusaders, we’re out of fighters..


7 posted on 11/29/2010 2:24:46 PM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

The five-barrel ‘Equalizer’ cannon was developed in the late 1970s, based on the mechanism of the GAU-8/A Avenger cannon, but firing a new NATO series of 25 mm ammunition. The GAU-12/U cannon is operated by a 15 hp (11 kW) electric motor, in external mounts supplied by a bleed air driven pneumatic system. Its rate of fire is normally 3,600 rounds per minute, with a maximum of 4,200 rounds per minute. For the AC-130, the fire rate was lowered to 1800 rounds per minute in order to conserve ammunition.

The Equalizer normally uses PGU-20/U armor-piercing incendiary (API) or PGU-22 or PGU-25 high explosive incendiary (HEI) ammunition. With a harder-hitting projectile and comparable muzzle velocity, it is more lethal than the older M61 Vulcan, more effective than the older 30 mm ADEN cannon it replaces, but not as effective and lethal as the Mauser BK-27.

GAU-22/A
The GAU-22/A is the latest application of the GAU-12/U, which is a four barrel version designed for use on the F-35 Lightning II.[1] In the CTOL version of the aircraft it will carry the gun internally, while on the STOVL and CV versions an external podded gun will be available. The major difference between the GAU-12/U and the GAU-22/A is the use of a four barrel system, rather than the five barrels on the standard GAU-12/U. The four barrel version is purported to reduce weight and improve accuracy. This system is currently undergoing intensive testing and qualification. The weapon’s current contractor is General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products.

The rate of fire is reduced to 3300 rounds per minute and the accuracy is increased to 1.4 milliradians radius as compared to the GAU-12.[2]

from wikipedia


8 posted on 11/29/2010 2:25:15 PM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat
I still say it should have been named the “Crusader II.” <>/I>

I think that might have been more appropriate for the "Monica" X-32.


9 posted on 11/29/2010 2:28:52 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

HTML malfunction!


10 posted on 11/29/2010 2:32:12 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson