Skip to comments.
How 250,000 US embassy cables were leaked
The Guardian UK ^
| 11/28/2010
| David Leigh
Posted on 11/29/2010 8:24:00 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
It was childishly easy, according to the published chatlog of a conversation Manning had with a fellow-hacker. "I would come in with music on a CD-RW labelled with something like 'Lady Gaga'
erase the music
then write a compressed split file. No one suspected a thing ... [I] listened and lip-synched to Lady Gaga's Telephone while exfiltrating possibly the largest data spillage in American history." He said that he "had unprecedented access to classified networks 14 hours a day 7 days a week for 8+ months".
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dontaskdonttell; espionage; gaystapotactics; homoagendaalert; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; manning; poofter; soshillary; traitor; treason; usembassy; wikileaks; wikileaksdocdump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: Signalman
It really doesn’t make a lick of sense. Is there more to this story or have we just become so lax?
21
posted on
11/29/2010 8:44:25 AM PST
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: dragnet2
Meanwhile, as this little shit runs free... Jonathan Pollard rots in a jail cell...
22
posted on
11/29/2010 8:44:35 AM PST
by
April Lexington
(Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Genoa
"We're still allowed to do that?? " I don't know. I'm not sure if anyone at DoD does. This is what happens when the federal judiciary inserts itself into areas that are plainly left to the Executive and Legislature.
BUT, this kid enlisted in 2006 or 2007. In fact, he was a specialist before he assaulted another soldier (for reasons unknown, lover's spat?), and was demoted to PFC by NJP. I believe when he actually "stole" these documents off a secure server, he was still a specialist, and had not yet been demoted to PFC (I believe).
To: Rutles4Ever
I'm beginning to be suspicious that the 0bama regime orchestrated the release of these documents for an ulterior motive.
24
posted on
11/29/2010 8:45:14 AM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: Signalman
Computers, networking and such make it easy to get stuff.
What I want to know is, why hasn’t this guy been tried and shot for espionage and treason?
25
posted on
11/29/2010 8:46:48 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
To: Rutles4Ever
China shipped nukes to Iran!!
Whatever..... I'm off to Walmart to get some of those great deals!!
26
posted on
11/29/2010 8:48:41 AM PST
by
dragnet2
To: Rutles4Ever; rlmorel
27
posted on
11/29/2010 8:49:00 AM PST
by
tubebender
(If you can not read, this thread will tell you how to get help)
To: April Lexington
Meanwhile, as this little shit runs free... Jonathan Pollard rots in a jail cell... Manning has been in solitary confinement for 7 months...No?
28
posted on
11/29/2010 8:51:18 AM PST
by
dragnet2
To: Rutles4Ever
The revelations shot Assange and WikiLeaks to global prominence but led to angry denunciations from the Pentagon and calls from extreme rightwingers in the US that Assange be arrested or even assassinated.
ugh....why does it ALWAYS have to be the evil EXTREME RIGHTWINGERS? You mean to tell me that Hillary isn't extremely angry by being made to look like a fool? And I would suspect that she is NOT an extreme rightwinger. But I know that it always fits the liberal template. "Journalists" can always be counted on to call out the EXTREME RIGHTWINGERS, but somehow they have a problem calling out the EXTREME MUSLIMS.
29
posted on
11/29/2010 8:54:35 AM PST
by
Eagle of Liberty
(formally known as Kerretarded....I changed my name)
To: The_Media_never_lie
He was allowed to come it with a RW CD? The computer he was using had a CD writer drive? He had unlimitied acces to thousands of diplomatic cables? Something about this is very fishy....we need to know who was in charge of security and what they were thinking. This happened on Hillary's watch, and I'm sure it's up to her to get to the bottom of this. Was there any security at all? An army private had unfettered access? Wow, what is going on? Exactly!
30
posted on
11/29/2010 8:54:46 AM PST
by
vox_freedom
(America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
To: Rutles4Ever
Yes, so many of the
Decision Makers value
expediency over security. It's amazing how so many
smart people can make the same mistake over and over again.
They wouldn't spend the time and money to monitor this grunt dildo's usage of documents. It would have been so simple.
Obviously Risk Management is not State's forte.
To: Signalman
Correct. When I was aboard ship, even I couldn’t get into the CIC area of the ship. At least not until I was cleared. Someone else is in on this.
An interesting point here.....It’s said that this info that was leaked, also includes data about money that was paid to other governments without our peoples knowledge. Our government has more to worry about than just the safety of our military.
32
posted on
11/29/2010 8:55:56 AM PST
by
RC2
To: Rutles4Ever
I’ve known people who worked in secure facilities where the rules were NO outside media of any kind (no CD’s thumb drives, etc.). The computers were boxed in wire cages so you could not even insert any media. So how did this happen?
To: ml/nj
The problem is not that digital information is inherently unsafe, it’s that the people with access to that information are inherently unsafe.
This has, of course, always been true. But 25 (copiers) or 50 (camera) years ago the guy who passed the information to wikileaks would have been able to get only a few documents out at most, not hundreds of thousands of pages.
Digital format merely makes it multiple orders of magnitude easier to copy and send information. Some small percentage of those with access will choose to do so. I know of no way to 100% eliminate the chance of somebody with access making such a choice.
It’s the same as with guns. Guns don’t kil people, people do. But guns make doing so much easier.
To: The Sons of Liberty
I'm beginning to be suspicious that the 0bama regime orchestrated the release of these documents for an ulterior motive. Shirley you can't be series.
35
posted on
11/29/2010 8:56:47 AM PST
by
McGruff
To: The Sons of Liberty
I'm beginning to be suspicious that the 0bama regime orchestrated the release of these documents for an ulterior motive.
Make Hillary out to be a fool in the eyes of the DUmmies?
36
posted on
11/29/2010 8:57:47 AM PST
by
Eagle of Liberty
(formally known as Kerretarded....I changed my name)
To: Rutles4Ever
The leaked cables range up to the "SECRET NOFORN" level, which means they are meant never to be shown to non-US citizens. No quite CLASSIFIED but still smells fishy.
37
posted on
11/29/2010 8:59:50 AM PST
by
McGruff
To: dragnet2
Social Justice, anyone????
38
posted on
11/29/2010 9:00:56 AM PST
by
April Lexington
(Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Rutles4Ever
It wasn’t a leak. It was treason.
39
posted on
11/29/2010 9:01:33 AM PST
by
Psycho_Bunny
(Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
To: Signalman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson