Skip to comments.
Rendell vetoes gun bill and two others
philly.com ^
Posted on 11/27/2010 1:40:45 PM PST by Sub-Driver
Rendell vetoes gun bill and two others
By Joelle Farrell
INQUIRER STAFF WRITER
Gov. Rendell on Saturday vetoed three bills, including a controversial measure that would have expanded a person's right to use lethal force.
Rendell said an expansion of the so-called "Castle Doctrine," would have "threatened not enhanced the public safety of Pennsylvania citizens." The law already protects residents' right to defend themselves in their homes, and the bill would have extended that right to virtually anywhere a person encountered a perceived threat.
"The bill as passed encourages the use of deadly force, even when safe retreat is available, and advances a 'shoot first, ask questions later' mentality," Rendell said in a statement issued Saturday afternoon. "I do not believe that in a civilized society we should encourage violent and deadly confrontation when the victim can safely protect themselves."
(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; edrendell; guncontrol; pennsylvania; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
He has only delayed the inevitable. This will pass under the new administration.
2
posted on
11/27/2010 1:45:36 PM PST
by
Jenny217
To: Sub-Driver
There are enough votes to OVERTURN this A$$HATS veto !
3
posted on
11/27/2010 1:47:14 PM PST
by
Renegade
To: Jenny217
Yes it will, Corbett im sure will pass this. I was surprised the state house put this on Rendells desk now????
4
posted on
11/27/2010 1:48:53 PM PST
by
beericus
(Putting the cool in conservatism, dip in the hip and a glid in the stride.)
To: Sub-Driver
Complicit in the murder of all citizens whose 2nd Amendment rights he's abridging, causing them to fall victim to predators.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
5
posted on
11/27/2010 1:48:59 PM PST
by
The Comedian
(Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
To: Sub-Driver
"I do not believe that in a civilized society we should encourage violent and deadly confrontation when the victim can safely protect themselves."Said the man that travels with an armed security detail. Precious.
6
posted on
11/27/2010 1:50:18 PM PST
by
Ethrane
("obsta principiis")
To: Sub-Driver
Do they have civilization in Philadelphia?
7
posted on
11/27/2010 1:52:29 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
To: Sub-Driver; All
I really wish I’d said it first but “A gun in hand is worth 2 cops on the way.”
8
posted on
11/27/2010 1:53:56 PM PST
by
j.argese
(Boycott Nevada.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Not after the sun goes down......
9
posted on
11/27/2010 1:55:31 PM PST
by
Sub-Driver
(Proud member of the Republican wing of the Republican Party)
To: Sub-Driver
this elitist leftist scum's gonna be outta office come January....we can wait.
10
posted on
11/27/2010 2:01:12 PM PST
by
Vaquero
(Dont pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Sub-Driver
an expansion of the so-called "Castle Doctrine," would have "threatened not enhanced the public safety of Pennsylvania citizens. Which citizens is he trying to protect? Law-abiding, or criminals?
11
posted on
11/27/2010 2:03:07 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
To: Jenny217
He is a scumbag nonethless.....poll after poll shows people want this.
12
posted on
11/27/2010 2:08:13 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
To: Sub-Driver
Rendell needs to Google "Brittany Zimmerman"
13
posted on
11/27/2010 2:10:07 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
To: Jenny217; All
It passed with veto proof majorities in both houses, but the legislative session is over, so there is no chance for a veto. Rendell has burned his bridges. He must not be considering running for an office in Pennsylvania. Perhaps he is looking at national office or an appointment in the Obama administration.
To: Renegade
This needs to be BH1 in the coming year.....with a stronger version (I am thinking of Texas).
15
posted on
11/27/2010 2:19:26 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
To: Red in Blue PA
16
posted on
11/27/2010 2:19:46 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
To: Renegade
Session is over. We have to start from scratch next year.
17
posted on
11/27/2010 2:34:23 PM PST
by
Dan Nunn
(Support the NRA!)
To: beericus
Because we have been working on this long before we knew who the candidates for governor would even be, let alone the winner.
18
posted on
11/27/2010 2:36:37 PM PST
by
Dan Nunn
(Support the NRA!)
To: Dan Nunn
Well, I understand that. I was just thinking out loud i guess.
So how are the next steps going to play out?
19
posted on
11/27/2010 2:42:06 PM PST
by
beericus
(Putting the cool in conservatism, dip in the hip and a glid in the stride.)
To: Sub-Driver
There is no such thing as a safe retreat.
20
posted on
11/27/2010 2:43:10 PM PST
by
fella
(.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson