Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Palin Be Frontrunner - or Kingmaker -- in 2012?
CBS News ^ | November 24, 2010 | Cass Gundry

Posted on 11/25/2010 11:45:55 AM PST by kingattax

TIME Magazine Reporter Jay Newton-Small told CBS News Correspondent Bill Plante on Wednesday's "Washington Unplugged" that Sarah Palin may be the favorite for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination.

"If she wanted to, she is the front runner for the nomination, if she isn't, she is the kingmaker," he said. "Either way, she is definitely a force to be reckoned with and not someone to underestimate."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kingmaker; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2010 11:46:01 AM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The clowns at CBS and Time need to worry about their comrades in their ‘RAT party. We Americans have our side handled and we don’t need THEIR help. Ain’t gonna be no mo John McCains and Bob Doles.


2 posted on 11/25/2010 11:49:57 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Don't touch my junk!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

She’ll be a queen-maker: herself.


3 posted on 11/25/2010 11:51:42 AM PST by NurdlyPeon (Sarah Palin: America's last, best hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Front runner and most likely to defeat Obama.

Are their any other non-beltway Conservatives? It would seem perhaps Haley Barbour might be the only other one, yet even he could be considered an insider and would be less likely than Gov. Palin to win.

4 posted on 11/25/2010 11:52:55 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
ineluctable

5 posted on 11/25/2010 11:54:58 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The people who hate Sarah Palin hate her because they know that her Presidency is inevitable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
We Americans have our side handled and we don’t need THEIR help. Ain’t gonna be no mo John McCains and Bob Doles.

They're going to certainly try with Romney.

6 posted on 11/25/2010 11:55:07 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Front runner. She wants it.

If she somehow doesn't win the primary, she's a shoein for the VP choice again. No one energizes the base like she does.

Personally, I'll happily support her if she is at the top of the ticket. I only wish there were a more seasoned and as exciting a conservative than she to head the ticket in 2012 and for her to be at the top of it in 2020.

7 posted on 11/25/2010 12:13:39 PM PST by DWar ("The ultimate destination of Political Correctness is totalitarianism.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWar

She will be which ever one she wants. And I am sick of the Romney bots and trolls posting their ... I love Sarah But ... If anyone would really rather have Romney or Huck , then you might as well join the democrats and vote for Obama. Not much difference between the three.


8 posted on 11/25/2010 12:18:21 PM PST by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: kingattax

The liberals, elites and most of the MSM BELIEVE that Sarah Palin is just some stupid hick.
Shhhh.
Meanwhile conservatives are laughing all the way to power!!!!


10 posted on 11/25/2010 12:36:05 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

In politics it is all about defining yourself before the media and opponent defines you. Sarah Palin has been defined and if she is serious about running, she needs lot of work to redefine her image. Need to boldly go out to the conservative media and talk about some policies, join the discussion among conservatives. May be one or two selected main stream media will also be good.

You cannot just simply talk about small government, less tax, no for obama healthcare and less spending. This will not cut it. Need to show that, she can discuss issues along with Newt Gingrich or Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney or Bobby Jindal or Paul Ryan. She needs to stop making mistakes like North Korea as an ally and that stupid stuff. Main stream media is waiting for her to make a single mistake. It is a huge distraction for 2012.


11 posted on 11/25/2010 12:50:01 PM PST by Ranjit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit
In politics it is all about defining yourself before the media and opponent defines you. Sarah Palin has been defined and if she is serious about running, she needs lot of work to redefine her image.

Evidently not, your candidate is well behind her, and so you really should be explaining why he isn't the frontrunner rather than trying to imply that the leading conservative is not actually the top politician in America, and the one most directly held up as President Obama's chief opposition.

12 posted on 11/25/2010 1:16:45 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

The liberals, elites and most of the MSM BELIEVE that Sarah Palin is just some stupid hick.


But, I’ve noticed a subtle change in the way the networks are talking about Palin. There’s more acceptance that she is here to stay and more willingness to talk about her status in the party and some of her positions. ABC has seen the power of Palin in bringing them their best ratings in years for DWTS. TLC is enjoying success with her Alaska series. Combined with the flack the big 3 networks have been getting for slamming Sarah, they may have realized that giving her some positive exposure gets them more viewers than doing hit pieces. Even some of the leftists are impressed about what she has been able to do since leaving office.

I hope that Sarah can identify some fair-minded people at the networks (granted there’s almost no Republicans) that can get her a foot-hold on the channels non-cable subscribers watch. People are dropping cable and satellite subscriptions in droves as they discover that there are now more over-the-air channels and many available online.

I think that an early candidacy by Palin will cause Huckabee, Pawlenty, Thune, and Gingrich to stand aside hoping for VP consideration and conceding that they don’t see a way of competing for the conservative base. More moderate and establishment candidates like Romney, Daniels, and Barbour will remain at least through the early primaries. If Palin doesn’t declare early, Romney will become the front runner by acclamation and Palin will have to compete with other conservatives as well. I would have thought that she would prefer later rather than sooner, but it’s hard to ignore momentum or to allow anyone else to gain some.


13 posted on 11/25/2010 1:30:42 PM PST by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
The liberals, elites and most of the MSM BELIEVE that Sarah Palin is just some stupid hick.

No, I think they know better, and are just trying to convince the masses of the lie.

Liberal Dems, liberal RINOs, liberal media are really not so smart. With real conservatism, everyone can prosper. With liberalism and RINOism, no one really prospers; but the liberal Dems and RINOs just suffer less badly than the productive citizens. It's a mental illness.

14 posted on 11/25/2010 1:32:58 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit
If the Republican Establishment were concerned about her "image," they would not have let her walk into the ambushes on ABC and CBS. She was set up by operatives in the McCain campaign who were probably furious with McCain's choice, who wanted to put her in her place. That she was the 150 watt bulb and the "Candidate" was a 75-watt bulb was evident even during the Convention. More telling than the Couric interview, IMHO, was the one with Charlie Gibson. My guess is that he had got "background" from the McCain people and was fully convinced of her unworthiness, that she was just another Quail type. Nothing else explains the lack of deference from a journalist who is not exactly the brightest bulb around.

Palin has her faults. Her experience did not bring her into contact with erudite people, and she doesn't have the intellectual glibness of the professorate or the dull palaver of the corporate boardroom. These are real assets in our society. The mistake is, however, to associate this with lack of intelligence. Calvin Coolidge was a highly intelligent man who could --and did --make very effective speeches. But he was much aware that he was not an outstanding platform speaker who could arouse audiences like TR or Wilson. He was, however, as he recognized, very good on the radio. Palin for all her glamour is almost too hot for TV and not well-spoken on the radio. She indulges herself in these run-on sentences. She needs to learn to listen to herself talk and stop the repetition of certain phrases. less is more in her case. Obama, ironically, has the same faults, but since he is talking professorese when he is not talking preacherese. this is not noted.

15 posted on 11/25/2010 2:07:55 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DWar
Personally, I'll happily support her if she is at the top of the ticket. I only wish there were a more seasoned and as exciting a conservative than she to head the ticket in 2012 and for her to be at the top of it in 2020.

I'm not so sure Gov. Palin, herself, doesn't feel exactly the way you do. I caught a little of her on Hannity the other day and was immediately struck by the thought: "She's a genius--she's running for President in 2020 (or 2016 if the disaster of a 2nd Obama term occurs) not 2012!"

16 posted on 11/25/2010 2:08:58 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: excopconservative

Barbour is probably the smartest of the moderates, but don’t think that his thick accent would not be a big handicap.


17 posted on 11/25/2010 2:14:06 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

I agree. She didn’t taken the nomination in’08 with the view of becoming President. She just wanted to get on the national stage.


18 posted on 11/25/2010 2:17:13 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
she's running for President in 2020

I think she is very spiritual believing God is in control. I think she is trying to elevate godly values and conservative principles and willing to let the chips fall where they may. If that's 2012, OK. If that's 2016 or 2020, OK. If that's never and all she has been able to do is represent those values as best she was able, I think she'll be OK with that too. But I am concerned about the Judas in the inner circle and about her losing her way in the midst of the battle. Within every successful endeavor lie the seeds of failure. Constant vigilance is needed that they are not watered.

19 posted on 11/25/2010 2:19:34 PM PST by DWar ("The ultimate destination of Political Correctness is totalitarianism.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I am not American, but if I were I would be rooting for Sarah for 2012. My Reasons? Surprisingly, (only to the ignorant) it is precisely because she had expressed clearly and succinctly the most truly sustantive positions on almost every major policy issue facing America—fiscal policy, economic development, employment growth, heathcare, enery independence, defence and security, foreign policy, good and bad immogration policies—you name it she has a well worked out position. I have not the foggiest notion what Mitt Romney stand for, other than being an opportunist. Search as I might, i cannot find the slightest evidence that either Barrack Obama or Hillary Clinton have ever actually accomplished anything substantial in their entire careers, and are purely the product of manufactured perceptions—or ‘marketing constructs’. I pray night and day that, over the next two years that the American people will recover their equilibrium and wisdom and overwhelmingly affirm the gift of Sarah Palin by electing her President. I may be a tiny minority in Europe (I am Irish) but on that day I will fall on my knees and weep with joy.


20 posted on 11/25/2010 2:41:22 PM PST by Emerson C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson