Posted on 11/24/2010 9:48:36 AM PST by DCBryan1
>Should threats against the leader of the greatest country on earth be taken seriously? Should it be against the law to threaten to kill him?
>
>Yes, regardless of which POS currently holds the title.
Didn’t you and I have a little talk about the possibility of a “no-gun zone” around the President and the legitimacy & feasibility thereof?
There’s a difference between a credible threat and an infirm old man expressing a wish that we might not agree with. IMO, the fact that he SAID such a thing proves he’s probably not competent.
I sat next to seniors from 2003 - 2008 and listened them them telling me angrily how “Bush should be SHOT”. Nobody came and arrested them. They weren’t threats, they were opinions and wishful thinking.
We really don’t want Obamalot, we have Obamatoomuch already.
I thought that while you are here I would wish you Happy Thanksgiving from all of us here on FR.
LOL!
“Didnt you and I have a little talk about the possibility of a no-gun zone around the President and the legitimacy & feasibility thereof?”
No
“Didnt you and I have a little talk about the possibility of a no-gun zone around the President and the legitimacy & feasibility thereof?”
No
LOL. Post of the Day!
Have a Happy Thanksgiving!(you too Mr.Agent Man)
He should of wrote a book, or made a movie about the assassination of Obama.
Well...It worked for leftists making threats against Bush.
There is a big difference between saying "Bush/Obama should be shot" and "I'm going to go kill Bush/Obama"
Take the poll at my blog:
The majority think Obama should be tried for treason BEFORE impeachment.
http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com
With President Bush we had books, movies, off-Broadway plays, all the way down to DIY postage stamps, with not a peep from the Secret Service. Now, when an old vet mentions something to his doctor, it is a full blown investigation
the teleprompter in chief does what all dhimmicrats do...puts the brother man on the plantation system....
though I tend to think the alleged zer0 threatener has a good sense of sarcasm and did not mean any of it....as in he could car less about the brothers and was trying to get a rise out of the bureaurocrats at the VA about shooting Bambam.
or is it twisted reporting?
Couple that with the new Uniform Child Abduction Prevention act...
and you have a perfect storm.
(:
>Dear Secert Service Agent,
>I thought that while you are here I would wish you Happy Thanksgiving from all of us here on FR.
Wasn’t Caligula’s Praetorian guard kind of like today’s secret service?
They have more than hearsay. They have his sworn statement.
Now if this Seasoned Citizen has “Written” a book detaling HOW to shoot the President....that would have been ok??
I can’t fault the SS here.
I read the report and based on what I read, their actions were appropriate, especially since he made no attempt to explain that he was just mouthing off.. If they asked if he had any more weapons in the house, he probably named them all.
They were just doing their jobs.
Lincoln
Garfield
McKinley
Kennedy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.