Highly unlikely that this case will get a hearing. I think the USSC prefers to leave Obama to the voters.
As Thomas said, they are “evading” the issue. This will never be heard. The US Constistution and We the People will be ignored again.
>>> Highly unlikely that this case will get a hearing. I think the USSC prefers to leave Obama to the voters.
Assuming one thinks the justices have their heads in the sand when it comes to widespread voter fraud and corruption.
I think so too.
My former senator said as much when he wrote me that the “voters vetted Obama.”
He made it sound like something akin to jury nullification: the action of a collecton of citizens supercedes written law.
So when the voters and the electors chose Obama, constitutional requirements became irrelevant.
Sounds like punting to me. This case needs a judicial determination, BAD! But I don’t think we’ll ever get one.
I’m hoping they’ve been biding their time, waiting til its far enough removed from uhbama’s dissing them at the SOTU address so it won’t be too obvious when they take up a Birther case. ;-)
typical political consort— the supreme Court—sworn to defend the US Constitution but ever afraid to soil their image by
considering any case that suggests that which the Court-and all public officers are sworn to defend has been violated
especially by members of our Government.Typical political whore.
Yes, a political minded court, rather than a constitutional, rule of law minded court would rather leave the law to a popular vote.
All fixed.