These guys can tell you everything you need to know, Janet.
Posted on 11/23/2010 4:31:37 PM PST by JohnKinAK
This lady (sic) doesn’t get it, does she? We don’t need a socio-psychological study to determine what turns ‘people’ into terrorists. There is a clear common denominator. Islam.
This is not sane. There is a book explaining about terrorism. It is a very popular book and many millions of people have read it and believe that it is a proper guide for their lives. It says they must kill people who do not believe as the book says to believe. People who do not read that book are not inclined to do such things.
“Napolitano said she hoped the U.S. could get to a place in the future where Americans would not have to be as guarded against terrorist attacks...”
Training well in the use of arms and carrying them will go a long way towards Americans defending themselves against terrorists, both foreign and domestic.
May she quickly meet her Waterloo!
Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson."
Come now do not give them any more ideas. Unfortunately yhey probably have other ideas like when driving you will be stopped and your vehicle and your junk inspected. Welcome comrade to a Soviet Style Police State. Hold on there is someone now knocking on my door. I better hurry up and finish this post, it might just be the internet police in the Socialist State of Michigan. Opps here there are striving to break down the door. Rausen Sie, Macht schnell, Sie schweinhund und ... Sorry this operator will be unable to finish his post because he is now been taken away be the new ObamaWaffenSturmTroopers in Michigan. Siege Heil Meine Fuhrer (just kidding)
We got a coupla Constitutional rights being foked with here—right to interstate travel and right to be free from unreasonable searches.
Lawyers, get on it.
Don’t forget Justice kagan...............
Well, that tears it.
I’m applying for a job with the TSA.
The exact translation of Stasi - “Die Staatssicherheitsdienst” - is “The department of homeland security.”
Not to fear, individual microchips coming soon, so they can keep us “safe.”
Already Bill Gates wants every infant born to be tagged and DNAd like wildlife. I’m sure anchor babies will be exempt though, as per usual.
I hope everyone enjoys their last days of imaginary freedom, it’s not much longer now.
Himmler would be proud of this anti-american administration.
Revolt and arm yourselves.
They’ve long been here along the entire border from CA/AZ through Texas. There are agriculture stations, DUI checkpoints, and most common of all, BP stops everywhere, within 100 miles of the border.
Where we used to freely travel, we are now interrogated and scrutinized by the BP, dogs sniffing our vehicles, made to feel like criminals, all in a transparent vehicle (clear camper shell) and in the primary line.
All because some little alien criminal’s feelings might get hurt if they’re busted at the border or actually deported for good.
The police state has long arrived, but without a fuss or muss. Not enough people noticed or cared, and the nation fell without a shot being fired.
These guys can tell you everything you need to know, Janet.
People shouldn’t forget that it was Nappy who placed Big Sister cameras EVERYWHERE in Arizona, even in formerly nice small towns. They were there as the post-apocalyptic/futuristic/prison-look welcoming committee, instead of some nice welcoming sign.
Luckily after we got rid of her, we got rid of the highway spy cams. But we still have the leftist city council putting them up as fast as the possibly can in the middle-class, white, gun-owning parts of our town (I’m not kidding).
Tar. Feathers. Rail. Just sayin’
The Right To Travel
As the Supreme Court notes in Saenz v Roe, 98-97 (1999), the Constitution does not contain the word “travel” in any context, let alone an explicit right to travel (except for members of Congress, who are guaranteed the right to travel to and from Congress). The presumed right to travel, however, is firmly established in U.S. law and precedent. In U.S. v Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), the Court noted, “It is a right that has been firmly established and repeatedly recognized.” In fact, in Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), Justice Stewart noted in a concurring opinion that “it is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, ... it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.” It is interesting to note that the Articles of Confederation had an explicit right to travel; it is now thought that the right is so fundamental that the Framers may have thought it unnecessary to include it in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.
Why not border patrol?
Oh, that’s right...it would be rayyy-cysssst!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.