What hold over the SCOTUS do you refer to?
BTW your comments are among the very best on FR about this. The Very, Very best because you tie things together and show clearly how it is the rule of law that is falling, and it is not just one man who is the enemy, as though 0bastard is gotten rid of not re-elected, or resigns, or even is removed, and All is Well with the World.
It is much deeper than that.
Thank you for your work. I wish I could help you but I’m pathetically disorganized and practically feeble minded.
I’m still researching and thinking about it, but I suspect that George Soros, his Islamist friends, and his commie hedge fund friends made the electronic run on the bank to create the financial crisis as a response to John McCain choosing Sarah Palin as his VP candidate, which brought McCain neck and neck in the polls. There is a sharp curve where McCain goes down and Obama up beginning on the very day the run on the bank occurred.
Soros & Co already knew that McCain wouldn’t approach the eligibility issue but didn’t know if McCain would be able or willing to muzzle Palin. And Berg’s case was heating up and being treated as credible by the judge.
I suspect that at that point Soros decided to pull out all the stops to get his puppet in. I believe he went to the media and to the judges (and continued to repeat the threats whenever necessary, or to reiterate them to new characters as they entered the picture) and told them that if they did anything to block Obama from becoming POTUS he and his allies would do again - maybe even on a bigger scale - the same thing they had done before, and collapse the entire world economy.
I know it sounds crazy; there’s a bunch more that goes into my suggesting it, which hopefully someday I’ll be able to post on. But when you consider Soros’ alliance with both communists and Islamists - both of which have as a goal the collapse of the US and of capitalism, it makes more sense. And the judges in the cases have done some bizarre things at very critical times which raise suspicions as well - stuff of questionable ethics which taints the cases they decided. I can’t help but wonder if they deliberately tainted those cases as a way of showing that their decisions were made under duress, since the acts were so blatant to anybody who knows the judicial code of ethics.
So anyway, that’s what I wonder about. Seems like the retired military folks were afraid that Lakin would continue to push the eligibility issue and the courts would eventually be forced to decide on it, in which case these retired military folks believed it would be decided wrongly. If so, they believed the system can’t be trusted as it is now.
And Justice Thomas said they were “evading” the issue of presidential eligibility - which is not something an earnest conservative would be willing to admit. Why would they evade it? Maybe because they thought Soros had a gun held against the nation’s head and they dare not make the right decision on an eligibility case because then he would shoot.
As I was explaining to humblegunner, I believe the story about the media being threatened is very credible. And there were lots of other story lines going on at the same time, with all of them being snuffed out seemingly from people at the top media and government levels. We all wondered why EVERYBODY fell into lock-step over this issue. That began shortly after the financial crisis, at the very time that the most eligibility trouble was brewing.