Posted on 11/23/2010 1:52:05 PM PST by dselig
Last week was the week when the idea that Sarah Palin is going to run for president began to sink in properly. As I explained, she is an immensely viable candidate for the 2012 Republican nomination.
Frank Rich, in the New York Times, argues that she is a shoo-in for Republicans because time is ripe for her populist stance, and because her defects are no greater than George W Bushs when he jumped into the 2000 primary race.
I am not so sure. The debates would prove a stiff test of her grasp of detail, and if she found the slings and arrows of running as vice-president and governing Alaska hard to cope with, how would she fare in the brutal terrain of a presidential race?
Palin is the best known quantity among the likely candidates. As First Read notes, her main task would be to broaden her appeal among a primary electorate that in the past has always opted for the candidate most likely to win the general election. With her negative numbers among Democrats and independents still high, that is quite a challenge.
Karl Roves comment that she lacks the gravitas for the top job continue to define the battle over Palin among Republicans. Barbara Bush, with the ultimate back-handed compliment, has now underlined how the old school views the Alaskan queen as an upstart. Palins unique style has already changed the game, but to win the nomination she may well need another game changer
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...
No wonder he wouldn't come back and answer. What a hypocrite.
Your points make sense but the “right to life” is not enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The Court found therefore it is violable by other persons.
You are correct. For every conservative fired-up abour Palin, there is an independent or moderate turned-off.
Wrong. The stated ultimate purpose the Constitution gives for itself is to "secure the Blessings of Liberty TO POSTERITY," and the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments clearly and succinctly protect the unalienable right to life of every person. It's an imperative.
The Court did NOT find the right to life "violable." The exact opposite is true. Blackmun stated in the Roe vs. Wade opinion that if the fetus is a person they are "of course" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And so he dehumanized the child.
I find it shocking to find someone on this website who thinks the right to life can be alienated.
“Doesnt ANYONE read her book? Going Rogue? Palin is NOT a friend to business.”
No, I’d like to hear though.
The agrarian Populists of the late nineteenth century advocated currency inflation, nationalization of the railroads, an income tax, direct election of senators, and limits to how much property one could own.
I don't fully agree with your premise but after having endured 4 yrs of Obama....Who do u think any 1/2 thinking independent would vote for given a choice between the two.... Obama or Palin????
(They may even have to hold their nose like conservatives have done for so long, but when that's the choice, one will be made)
As to....
>I don't know who the RIGHT person is ... I just know Palin isn't it.<<<
Point blank..if its Obama vs. Palin in 2012....WHO WILL U VOTE FOR???
Ill make it simple for you
A. Obama
B. Palin
(the answer to that one question will tell you alot about yourself and your conservatism as well as inform the board) Thanks in advance
Judging by the results of the recent elections, it seems the independents are directing their anger toward left wing radicals like Obama and Pelosi.
The Palin cult...
Insulting her supporters won't change anyone's mind. This rest of your post goes on like this...just mindless babble without any substance what-so-ever.
Nope, not really. I did think he would have made a better choice than McCain or Huck in 08, but that’s not saying much. I certainly hope we get real solid conservative choices in 2012 and not 2008 candidate retreads.
The reality is that you were a hard core romneybot, that is why you are on their ping lists.
This is some of the cream of the crop of the Romney trolls, most of them are gone, but the ones that aren’t, are now anti-Palin trolls also.
To: Spiff; Reaganesque; Rameumptom; elizabetty; bethtopaz; restornu; lonevoice; WOSG; TheLion; ...
Too bad Mitt cannot win the primary, Palin can.
nmh is still a Romney guy, this thread is attracting them.
“Obama’s lack of experience is not the problem. He has intentionally taken actions to destroy this Republic. No amount of so called experience would change that.”
Maybe. My point about Obama was that lack of experience is what made it harder to take the measure of the man and determine what he is really made of. Obama’s liberal tendencies were hidden by his campaign successfully because he spent so little time in US Senate. ... Track record, paper trail, whatever you want to call it. If we had it on Obama, he never would have even made it to the White House.
Gov Jan Brewer passed a tough immigration law against the wishes of the media, elites and the administration. Gov Christie is standing up to teachers unions. The experience of taking on tough fights on behalf of the conservative agenda like that is the experience we should be looking for.
“Reagan had many years as a celebrity to develop his personal skills — still, he was despised and seldom taken seriously by the opposition.”
ANY powerful conservative is hated by the liberals.
They hated Reagan, hated Gingrich, hated GW Bush, hated Cheney. We knew Gingrich was doing the right thing in 1994 because he was hated.
They only start liking these guys after they are powerless or dead.
The Palinphobia of the left is indeed an indication that she must be doing SOMETHING right.
I think that Palin can win the GOP Primary without breaking a sweat, but she has to overcome negatives with independents to win the general. Plenty of time for that.
How is Sarah Palin not conservative?
And which of the other mentioned contenders has a shred of conservatism anywhere in their makeup?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.