Eh. Time to call in the dogs and p!$$ on the fire. Love his politics and gave him a little money, but he turned out to be a rather weak candidate. Princess Lisa won fair and square. Let’s get her next go-round.
The SEIU holding meetings on government time, on government property and telling State employees that they “need to vote for Lisa”, and how to vote for her is “fair and square”? The state election commission changing state law at the last minute to allow printed instructions on how to write in her name to be brought into the polling place, something that was previously illegal is “fair and square”? You have a funny definition.
Fair and square my ass.
Quitter.
He’s the only conservative in US history that has challenged a corrupt adversary and you call him a weak candidate!
What if he turns it around? Will you then call him a sore winner?
“Princess Lisa won fair and square.”
You’ve gotta be kidding, right? What about:
**unsecured ballot boxes,
**other precincts where numerous ballots appear to be in the same handwriting,
**others where there is 100% voter turnout
**and still other precincts where the ballots were sent to the Division of Elections presorted by U.S. Senate candidate.
**Voter intent not being applied to Miller votes, but only to murky write-in votes.
You call that fair and square. Come again?
No (BLEEPIN) way!!! Just fegedaboudit!!! That’s the typical countryclub, good sport, it was just a good natured contest Republican response. Republicans should be firebreathin Americans filled with fight to the finish for the rule of law and have nothing to do with “throwin in da towell!!!”
Murky and her ilk have been defrauding the people of Alaska for years. Having an R next to a name is not an absolution for crimes!
If you back a crook, then you are complicit in their crimes. If you condone such crookedness then you deserve the bitter fruits of your low moral standard.
Lets get her next go-round.”””
Not a good plan.
6 years in today’s climate is waaaaay too long.
Wow, I sure would like you to elaborate further on your definition of “fair and square” ...