Citing the US Constitution's amendment regarding search and seizure, in reference to the government imaging people who are not criminals, for "security" purposes. Does that stand deserves his wife being harassed, if that's why it happened...?
Could it possibly be the "liberty" of Palestinians to drive all Jews into the sea?
If that's what comes to your mind when "pro-liberty" is brought up, you are a very sick person, IMO. Please just take your Palistinian fantasies someplace far away if you can't keep from projecting like that.
What other "liberty" have Palestinians ever fought for?
Your obsession with Palestinians is rather disturbing.
Are you further revealing yourself?
Yes. I am a pro-liberty, pro-American patriot.
Do you mean known propaganda outlets should not only me analyzed for the intentions of the enemy but should be now seen as a source of actual facts and truth?
Yes. It's called "intelligence"...and guess what...if a propaganda outlet reprints something, it doesn't suddenly change the truth, no matter how much you try to believe the whole world is dominated by quantum physics bizarre tricks.
Or maybe you're just a narcissist, who thinks that reality follows your observations, not the other way around. I knew a girl who went into the psych ward for such thoughts. Good luck with your condition--I hope it's something that can be easily treated, preferably by education not medication.
What next? Are you now going to enlighten us with the truth as published in propaganda outlets of Iran, Syria, Cuba, North Korea.....?
Sure. If it published purely falsehoods, it would be easily dismissed. One hint about propaganda--different types exist. One type is by using omission.
If America is a spectrum from good to bad, mostly good, but you print only the bad--you can print purely truthful pieces, yet give a distorted view.
Someone who is illogical would use fallacious reasoning (look at, for example, the fallacies of composition and division) and think that you can't use propaganda as a source of truthful stories, yet the intelligent, logical person would realize that propaganda may consist of 100% factual and unbiased stories.
Of course, the whole thing is a red herring, as the stories are also in sources other than the propaganda outlets.
You're "pro-liberty" in connection with Dr. Bradshaw's husband's statements against Israeli security policies for passengers suspected to be supporters of Palestinian terrorism, and you try to wrap it in the US Constitution.
Yet, you're not "pro-liberty" with FReepers' comments against the US TSA's new wholesale attack on the majority of Americans' Constitutional right against unreasonable searches. To you & the TSA, having those Americans, their children & and elderly parents fondled and abused is better than the use of a targeted Israeli method. Again, revealing!
To your ilk the abuse of the Constitutional rights of millions of Americans is preferable to offending a minority (who may not all be terrorists, but from whose ranks virtually all terrorists come) along with terrorist sympathizers by a targetted screening on the basis of rational and reasonable criteria.
"Pro-liberty" for enemy 5th column, useful idiots and protected PC minorities... BUT not "pro-liberty" for the rest - the vast majority - of everyday Americans. Ha!
As for the rest of your comment ('propaganda is your friend'), the feeble contortions you felt necessary to try to dig yourself out of the self-revealing hole you've dug yourself are too ludicrous and short of any mark to warrant a response.
Finally, now that all know which side each of us are on, don't bother to respond! It will only be more of the same.