Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spok

This is one case where I wouldn’t care if the references to Christmas were gone. Retailers don’t need to wear the name of a sacred holiday on them. I would be happier if they also didn’t do it by their own decision.


10 posted on 11/22/2010 2:35:22 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Morpheus2009
Thank you for sharing your opinion. Now here's mine :

Please go away!
We actually don't need a Christian Taliban.

28 posted on 11/22/2010 3:17:11 PM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Morpheus2009

Christmas is a celebration of the birth of Christ, it is not His real birthday. It is not a Biblical holiday (holy day). So it is not a sacred holiday in that sense.

If retailers want to benefit from the event called Christmas (since one of it’s tenets is gift giving), they should stop trying to act like the reason they are advertising ISN’T Christmas.

That is all anyone wanted.

If they are trying to sell products based on Hanukah (sp) or even the made up communist Kwaanza celebration (barf), then they should mention those reasons, also.


36 posted on 11/22/2010 4:06:21 PM PST by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson