Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury finds Ingmar Guandique guilty of murder of Chandra Levy [Condit is still a dirtbag]
Fox news Alert (Live) ^ | 22 NOV 10 | dcbryan1

Posted on 11/22/2010 10:12:30 AM PST by DCBryan1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: WaterBoard

Scarborough, that Rino on MSNBC, was best friends with Condit. He had a DEAD intern turn up in his office.


21 posted on 11/22/2010 11:13:30 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
LOL Jim Rob!

I had (Gary Condit is still a scumbag) in the title, but the Admin Mod removed it ;)

Will be in Paso Robles in a month or so. Lemme know what your favorite wine is!

22 posted on 11/22/2010 11:14:14 AM PST by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Gary Condit is a dirtbag.

That's an insult to dirtbags.

23 posted on 11/22/2010 11:15:13 AM PST by dfwgator (Texas Rangers -Thanks for a great season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Gut instinct. A first initial reaction is usually right, even though it may not be logically explainable at the time.

Most people immediately KNEW Condit had something to do with it, just like people KNOW OJ killed his wife. Just because these creeps manage to get off doesn't mean they're innocent.

The immigrant was no saint and probably should have been in jail a long time ago, but he sure made a good patsy when one was needed.

24 posted on 11/22/2010 11:19:33 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Condit’s mysterious travels throughout the streets of DC and as far away as western VA to dispose of his conquest trophies in the weeks after her disappeance cannot be explained logically as the acts of an uninvolved man.

Yep.

25 posted on 11/22/2010 11:21:10 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Your next chance like this? About 2044. Vote popularity and don't waste time with the details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

“I think it is questionable as to wther this guy killed her.”

The evidence is compelling about the illegal’s guilt. The jury’s conclusion is strong evidence about his guilt.


26 posted on 11/22/2010 11:21:42 AM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

I couldn’t agree with you more.

This is a travesty.


27 posted on 11/22/2010 11:22:09 AM PST by Fishtalk (Dance like nobody's watching; Sing like nobody's listening; Blog like nobody's reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Most people immediately KNEW Condit had something to do with it, just like people KNOW OJ killed his wife.


28 posted on 11/22/2010 11:24:31 AM PST by dfwgator (Texas Rangers -Thanks for a great season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

Another inmate testifying that he killed her is hardly “compelling evidence”. In fact, there was no evidence at all that I have heard.

No eyewitnesses, no DNA, nothing. I would have agreed but there is no evidence at all.

Juries get it wrong sometimes. Google OJ Simpson.


29 posted on 11/22/2010 11:37:44 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fungoking
Doing the rapes and murders Americans won’t do.

Don't you mean being the political scapegoats to rapes and murders? If only Teddy Kennedy knew of some illegals on Chappaquiddick back in '69, he might have been President!

30 posted on 11/22/2010 11:44:19 AM PST by ssaftler ("Politically Correct" is neither!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

Having served on several military court martial panels my instinct says Ingmar’s jury rendered the verdict they believed to be correct—that is it was based on the evidence presented.

People tend to take very seriously finding someone guilty of a capital crime. Moreover, the jury selection process tends to favor the defense.

That said, it does not mean Condit was not complicit in the murder. And it in no way absolves him of taking advantage of his position to seduce a young women that was never going to be his wife. Condit was and is a first class dirt bag.


31 posted on 11/22/2010 11:52:06 AM PST by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Remember the woman who accused Kobe Bryant? She had DNA from 3 different men in her drawers.

She must have been a collector.

32 posted on 11/22/2010 12:13:54 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (/s, in case you need to ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dools0007world

“That said, it does not mean Condit was not complicit in the murder.”

Condit was thoroughly investigated. After some initial reluctance, he fully cooperated with law enforcement. No evidence has ever linked Condit to her disappearance or murder. The mistaken focus on Condit may have contributed to the delay in apprehending the real murderer.

Chandra was a willing partner in the affair. She knew he was married. I believe that she was 24 at the time of the affair so she was not just fresh out of high school. I do not approve of the affair but thousands of Americans have affairs every year. Condit was a serial philander. Chandra was not his only affair during the time.

An affair is not a crime. He did not deserve accusations of murder. He was unlucky in that suspicion would naturally fall on him. Sometimes life is not fair. Affairs can lead to associated fallouts in life.


33 posted on 11/22/2010 12:51:28 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Is this the type of “Opportunity” that this Salvadorian was thinking about when he came to America?

This guy is going to be alive for about another 30+ years getting 3 squares a day with free room and board courtesy of liberals and taxpayers before he’s even executed.


34 posted on 11/22/2010 1:58:34 PM PST by Amerikan_Samurai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

You’re a so-called professor? Never said he was complicit or that he committed a crime.

Funny, though, if he had not gotten involved with this woman he would never have come under suspicion. Isn’t that so? The fact is, he used his elected position, a position of power, to have irresponsible sex with a young woman he never intended to marry. Corporations and civil service have sanctions for that kind of behavior.

Now you can wriggle and spin until hell freeezes over but it doesn’t change the bottom line: Condit, and people like him, are societal slugs. Oh, and if the shoe fits wear it.


35 posted on 11/22/2010 2:34:08 PM PST by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dools0007world

” it does not mean Condit was not complicit in the murder.”

Your statement implies that he was somehow involved.

I am not sure that he used his position of power. I do not think there is any evidence that he provided a job or special favors for Chandra. She was probably attracted to his position.

I am not condoning his behavior. Affairs are destructive behavior. I admit that he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. However, if the DC police had performed a competent investigation, resources would not have been wasted on Condit.


36 posted on 11/22/2010 3:20:04 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; Just A Nobody; LucyT; BunnySlippers; ..
Another example of the corruption of the American criminal justice system!

How can any jury convict a man - even a man with a serious criminal record - of a murder with no physical or forensic evidence to link him to the crime, nor anyone able to place him at or near the supposed location of the crime at the time it occurred?

Indique had been a suspect questioned by DC Police months after Levy's disappearance and released at the time for lack of evidence.

Very convenient for DC authorities to put the rap on one local lowlife like Indique for an alleged random street crime, rather than fully explore the possibility of a goon or goons hired by Condit, perhaps coming into DC from out of town, to do the dirty work.

37 posted on 11/22/2010 3:55:04 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

I can’t believe how many typos I have on this thread ...


38 posted on 11/22/2010 5:08:38 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Gary Condit is a dirtbag.

That comment brings back memories of our weekly FReeps down on the corner near Condit's office.

As I recall, you hollered that into the open bus doors when it stopped on the corner to drop off or pick up passengers.

That's how I'll always remember my Congressman - a dirtbag.

39 posted on 11/22/2010 5:52:55 PM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

I am not buying the result.


40 posted on 11/22/2010 9:02:44 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson