Just a synposis of what is running now in Japanese, on Nikkei, with a link to the original article. BREAKING....
To: TigerLikesRooster
PING!
Yonhap went with it this afternoon. Now picked up by Japanese news services.
2 posted on
11/21/2010 10:15:13 PM PST by
AmericanInTokyo
("Oh well then, I JUST WON'T FLY ANYMORE"...(Don't kid yourself. Airports are just their beginning.))
To: AmericanInTokyo
South Korea Kim stated that this is to put a halt to North Korean nuclear weapons ambition, and is now being considered, which will go back on South Korea's committment in 1991 under President Roh Tae Woo to never manufacturer, house or use nuclear weapons in South Korea.< Wonder how China will respond to this news? Let alone N.Korea Kim. This would change the equation just in the announcement.
4 posted on
11/21/2010 10:25:01 PM PST by
caww
To: AmericanInTokyo
South Korea will never again be able to count on the protection of the US with anything but talk. They should build it and far to the south where it couldn’t quickly and easily be overrun.
5 posted on
11/21/2010 10:29:25 PM PST by
DWar
("The ultimate destination of Political Correctness is totalitarianism.")
To: AmericanInTokyo
a thousand centrifuges and most advanced technology, rivaling our own (fox news this am, scroll at bottom, nuke scientest who had toured facility) is not a good thing
15 posted on
11/21/2010 11:19:09 PM PST by
blueplum
To: AmericanInTokyo
No, no - the last thing South Korea needs is nukes.
Nothing good will come of their “Cowboy Diplomacy”.
What they need is wimpy, French Homosexual diplomacy - like we have under Obama.
It’s doing great for us. :)
26 posted on
11/22/2010 12:50:48 AM PST by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: Quix; The Comedian
To: Quix; Whenifhow; houeto; null and void; Squantos; xrmusn; bronxville; Screaming_Gerbil; ...
Thanks Whenifhow -
"Nuclear Terror" ping.
Low volume (I hope) ping list covering atomic/nuclear/thermonuclear terrifying events and discussions.
FReepmail me if you want on or off The Comedian's "Nuclear Terror" ping list...
![](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/4175015880_cea9ebed9e_m.jpg)
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
29 posted on
11/22/2010 3:31:04 AM PST by
The Comedian
(I enjoy progressives, especially in a light cream sauce.)
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...
This is a problem? :’) Thanks AmericanInTokyo.
31 posted on
11/22/2010 3:59:16 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Mutually Assured Destruction
32 posted on
11/22/2010 4:10:33 AM PST by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: AmericanInTokyo
34 posted on
11/22/2010 4:51:15 AM PST by
rdl6989
(January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Thank you for all of your great posts. Really, they are of real value to this forum!
35 posted on
11/22/2010 5:02:07 AM PST by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Unless South Korea already has tactical nukes on hand I doubt that they’ll get anything from barry any time soon. The man is dedicated to the nuclear disarmament of the US and our allies...what makes anyone in Korea think he’ll change course for them? Does anyone lnow if the South Koreans already have tactical nukes? Besides what may or may not be on their soil under US control?
38 posted on
11/22/2010 5:52:22 AM PST by
pgkdan
(Protect and Defend America! End the practice of islam on our shores before it's too late!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Tactical nukes! Douglas MacArthur’s ghost is knowingly smiling.
40 posted on
11/22/2010 6:52:37 AM PST by
drpix
To: AmericanInTokyo
S Korea and Japan need STRATEGIC nukes more than tactical ones.
The NORKS are Chicom puppets kept on life support just to intimidate the West.
China now has a massive inefficient business orientated infrastructure so interconnected with all the outs and ins of their huge economy the slightest disruption at any of the thousands of logistical bottlenecks would bring the entire Chinese imitation Capitalist society house of cards to a crashing smoking pile of paper.
The Chicom mob bosses know this and they also know a few Japanese Taiwanese and S Korean land based ICBMs pointed in their direction would cause a tremendous shift in their foreign policy--like curbing their rabid NORKies.
They would,of course,threaten and bluff,but without an operational ABM system MAD would restrict their behavior just like the Soviets and the USA.
45 posted on
11/22/2010 7:12:34 AM PST by
Happy Rain
("GO GAMECOCKS--THE REAL USC!!!")
To: AmericanInTokyo
46 posted on
11/22/2010 7:24:48 AM PST by
PatriotGirl827
(Lord Jesus, direct my mind, possess my heart, transform my life)
To: AmericanInTokyo
“Tactical nukes” are arguably a contradiction in terms, but this ought to send a message to China.
49 posted on
11/22/2010 8:07:01 AM PST by
dr_who
To: AmericanInTokyo
“Tactical nukes” are arguably a contradiction in terms, but this ought to send a message to China.
50 posted on
11/22/2010 8:07:05 AM PST by
dr_who
To: AmericanInTokyo
I doubt Obama would do it.
61 posted on
11/22/2010 7:39:19 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: AmericanInTokyo
We are closing in to Armageddon if nobody can stop Jong-il and Ahmadinejad over their nuke craze. Very soon all the terrorist adventurist regimes around the world will like to follow their example, including those living on alms. When that happens, MAD will no longer deter.
63 posted on
12/07/2010 7:17:01 AM PST by
Alerter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson