Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: earlJam
Well, I would rather have a president that has experienced life on a more common level. I feel it would help them govern with real people in mind and the average, everyday concerns of us average people.

It does no good to act "presidential" if the end result is an out of touch "Obama" who has no clue what it takes to live in the real world.

209 posted on 11/21/2010 7:18:19 PM PST by CAluvdubya (Palin 2012...YOU BETCHA!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: CAluvdubya

I agree with that.


225 posted on 11/21/2010 7:21:26 PM PST by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

To: CAluvdubya
Well, I would rather have a president that has experienced life on a more common level.

I agree. But note the media double standard:

George H.W. Bush was so "out of touch" that (the media claimed) he was baffled by a supermarket scanner. Obviously (they said) a rich guy who never had to deal with the real world was basically unfit to be president.
Sarah Palin (they now say) is so common -- why, she didn't even go to an Ivy League School! -- can you imagine someone who knows how to work in a fish processing plant actually serving as president?! How uncouth! We deserve better than that!

They never question anything about Obama, but any Republican is either too hoity-toity, or else too common. Any way you look at it, Republicans are unfit.

My own view is that this will backfire on the media and that people will see how real Palin is and decide that the country needs exactly that right now.

240 posted on 11/21/2010 7:26:53 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson