Wrong again. I don’t work for the TSA, don’t know anyone that does, and only fly about twice a year.
Why can’t you accept - with Occam’s Razor logic - that there is a decently-sized group of very conservative FReepers that want aggressive airline security and, if there is error, it’s on the side of safety? Rather than adopt the longterm DU/ACLU mentality that you have only lately embraced? Or come up with a cockamamie conspiracy idea that I would disavow everything that I “really, wink wink” believe in, just in order to infiltrate to annoy on a rather tangential topic?
ALL of us what aggressive airline security, that has never been a question.
Can you name other members of this "decently-sized group" of FReepers who support groping like you do? Can you name even one?
Rather than adopt the longterm DU/ACLU mentality that you have only lately embraced?
See troll, that's where you're off course.
The left is fine with the groping. What they oppose is PROFILING even though it's proven to work.
For one things, there isn't a decently -sized group of very conservative FReepers who support this. There are just a few RINO trolls who support it.
But to answer your question, because that kind of aggressive *security* doesn't work, isn't going to stop the next terrorist attack, gives the government too much power, violates the fourth amendment, and is NOT a conservative stand.
You can't be as conservative as you claim to be and support that kind of tyrannical, flagrant trashing of the Bill of Rights.
zot