Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah Barracuda

I just had an idea. If one airline would insist on special gates and publicly stand that they will be using the El Al style behavior profiling only, and eschewing this useless invasive searching and scanning (they can scan the luggage), that airline would get EVERYONE’S business. (And then all airlines will want to do it.)

Are the airlines still “free” enough to do such a thing? I am thinking of airlines that have a more individual bent like Jet Blue. Does Obama have too strong a hold over their right to conduct business? Can they get around the airport security somehow??


248 posted on 11/20/2010 11:54:28 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle
Are the airlines still “free” enough to do such a thing?

They can't institute individual rules like that, as airport security isn't for the passengers of the plane as much as those on the ground. United Airlines Flight 93 would have been shot down to save D.C.

260 posted on 11/21/2010 12:26:41 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson