[Chunga85]

Another left wing nut. His real agenda is to transfer wealth to the deadbeat middle-class using our tax dollars and obviously sell a book.

Click through to the link and it links to even more anti-business nonsense. Like this one

[Chunga85]

Sarcasm PING. /s

[Graybeard58]

with 1 percent controlling 24 percent of American income

I did not click the link. Did the butt munch mention later in the article what percent of income taxes are paid by that 1% or how many jobs are created by that 1%?

I am not in that 1%, nor do I envy them or even care how much wealth they have.

[ClearCase_guy]

I like the rich.
I oppose high taxes on the rich.
The rich create jobs and grow the economy.

Now, having said all that, I have to add that our VAST government budget, with it's TRILLION dollar deficit is being parceled out, by government bureaucrats, to both rich and poor alike. There are government regulations and government subsidies that help the rich. Rich folks make a lot of political contribution either on behalf of themselves, or on behalf of their companies -- and while they might sometimes make these contributions out of the goodness of their hearts, in most cases they do it because they want something in return.

We have a fascist system. It's been here for years. The government helps certain people and those certain people help the government.

I don't know if the author looks at it the same exact way I do, but I say the Rich get Richer, and the solution to that problem is to drastically decrease government spending and make the government a smaller part of our economy and a smaller part of our society.

[The Comedian]

Class envy distraction.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[4rcane]

Thou shall not covet what belongs to another man

[yldstrk]

There is plenty for everybody if God is your copilot.

If the devil is your guide, you have to grab for all you can because there might not be enough left.

[stefanbatory]

Bush’s fault...

[1010RD]

Wait a minute. He’s got a point that conservatives can back 100%.

There are two types of successful entrepreneurs - market and political.

A market entrepreneur does it without any government help or subsidy - think Vanderbilt or Rockefeller.

A political entrepreneur does it with “tax breaks” and subsidies or tariffs - think Sugar or Ethanol.

We want and need the market entrepreneur. We need to destroy the second the political entrepreneur.

That’s a political posture that a huge majority of Americans can support. It’s a winner for 2012.