Posted on 11/19/2010 6:50:35 AM PST by WebFocus
By telling Barbara Walters that she thinks she can defeat President Obama, Sarah Palin has dimmed hopes cherished by sensible Republicans that she might decide against a run for the White House in 2012. Here are just some of the reasons she should not run.
The Republican nominee should be someone with a vast and impressive record in government and the private sector. Voters chose a novice with plenty of star power in 2008 and will be inclined to swing strongly in the other direction in 2012. Americans will be looking for sober competence, managerial skill, and maturity — not sizzle and flash.
After the 2008 campaign revealed her substantive weaknesses, Palin was advised by those who admired her natural gifts to bone up on policy and devote herself to governing Alaska successfully. Instead, she quit her job as governor after two and a half years, published a book (another is due next week), and seemed to chase money and empty celebrity. Now, rather than being able to highlight the accomplishments of Sarah Palin’s Alaska, we get Sarah Palin’s Alaska, another cheesy entrant in the reality-show genre. She’d so much rather be out dog sledding than in some “dull political office,” she tells the audience. File that.
It’s true. She is wildly popular with a swath of the Republican electorate. And, as a conservative woman politician told me, political consultants (who get paid the big bucks, win or lose) will doubtless descend upon her with game plans showing how she can win in Iowa and then cruise to the nomination. Maybe. But the general election would be a problem, since 53 percent of independent voters view Palin unfavorably along with 81 percent of Democrats, according to a recent Gallup poll.
There is no denying that Sarah Palin has been harshly, sometimes even brutally, treated by the press and the entertainment gaggle. But any prominent Republican must expect and be able to transcend that. Palin compares herself to Reagan. But Reagan didn’t mud-wrestle with the press. Palin seems consumed and obsessed by it, as her rapid Twitter finger attests, and thus she encourages the sniping. She should be presiding over meetings on oil and gas leases in the North Slope, or devising alternatives to Obamacare. Every public spat with Dave Letterman or Politico, or the “lamestream media,” or (God help us) Levi Johnston, diminishes her.
Speaking of television, have you watched “Dancing with the Stars”? Calling the show cheesy would be too generous. Perhaps the former governor should not be blamed for the decisions of her adult daughter. Yet there in the audience we see Sarah and Todd Palin, mugging for the camera and cheering on their unwed-mother daughter as she bumps and grinds to the tune of “Mamma Told Me Not To Come.” Her parents had advised her, the 20-year-old Bristol told an interviewer, that she had to stay “in character” if she expected to win. Being “in character” evidently meant descending to the vulgarity that DWTS peddles on a weekly basis. The mama grizzly was apparently unfazed by, or — equally disturbingly — unaware of, the indignity. And she is supposed to be a conservative culture warrior?
Voters prize judgment, above all, in a presidential candidate. Some of Sarah Palin’s 2010 endorsements were sound and arguably helpful. Others betrayed flightiness and recklessness. Tom Tancredo, Palin’s choice for governor of Colorado, has ridden his anti-immigration hobby-horse in a style perfectly suited to alienate Hispanic voters (describing Miami, for example, as a “Third World city”). Her endorsement of Christine O’Donnell was irresponsible and damaging, losing a seat that would otherwise have been a Republican pick-up. Of course, O’Donnell received an absurdly disproportionate amount of ink and attention during the race (the liberal press naturally seizes upon any opportunity to make conservatives look kooky), but Palin should have anticipated that. Besides, this one cannot be laid at the feet of the biased media. O’Donnell was a thoroughly unqualified candidate.
Palin has many strengths. I admire her fortitude and her principles. Her ability to connect with a crowd is something most politicians can only dream of. I will always remember her 2008 convention speech as a rollicking star turn. She would be terrific as a talk-show host — the new Oprah.
But a presidential candidate? Someone to convince critical independent voters that Republicans can govern successfully? Absolutely not.
— Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist.
The left doesn't want the first woman President to be a conservative AND lovely. All they got is Hillary. ;-)
Back in the Summer of 2008 (starting a couple months before she was picked as McCain's running mate) I was posting that she was the only conservative out there with the the personality to energize conservatives. I remember EVERYONE thought I was nuts back then.
Actually, 2ndDivisionVet notified me last night about the article and I thought he was going to post it.
After all, Moma is part of the establishment and it was her turn at bat.
Week #3 of STOP SARAH PALIN.
I guess so!
Ok, I’m shocked at how sensitive Conservatives are on here. I always thought it was Liberals who denied different points of views and expected Liberals to all be lock-step in line on every issue, and get all twisted when someone tells them not to “cream their jeans”.
I’m ashamed at how many of you are acting the same way.
What do you mean “back then”? :)
“So your reality is the indy’s would/could consider voting for Barry. Do you buy your reality or is given to you?”
I never said that they would vote for Obama. But if they don’t like Palin, what’s stopping them from not voting at all? That’s reality.
It's called "morality" and it describes conservative values. Lefty's trash talk filth. Such as being all "wee weed up".
Ashamed enough to opus?
Noobs don't get all the conservative privileges right away. You have to earn 'em.
(and you're not earning 'em)
That has been washed out!
zot
Just for the record, I don't appreciate sarcasm when it's directed at ME. :-)
:)
And then there was Obama.
Experience?
A man who never even served one term as Senator before dipping his political toes into the Whitehouse race and never even held a top position in either a working company or even any leadership experience other than ACORN.
He has no discernible background, or any that anyone can check, and yet, he’s now the POTUS.
Standards? What standards?
The American people are ‘fickle’ and will vote with their emotions, not with their heads.
No you can’t stand that the PALIN attacks are being responded to.
If your ashamed take your azz somewhere else.
Week Three of STOP SARAH PALIN - how’s it working?
Just about as well as that hopey/changey stuff.
I’ll guarantee you that Mona did not pull a Peggy Noonan and support the boy marxist in any way. Charen is a serious conservative. But like Rush and Levin’s moronic brainfarts, she somehow believed Mitt’s lies. But supported Obama? Not a chance.
Exactly right.
Thanks. What a filthy mouth that poster had!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.