Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Former Car Czar Caught in Scandal: What about the Vetting Process?
Federal Review ^ | 11/18/10

Posted on 11/18/2010 6:42:42 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

President Obama's original car czar has been sued for corruption in New York:

Former Obama administration official Steven Rattner was sued by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo Thursday for his role in a pay-to-play scheme involving New York's pension fund.

Rattner, the former auto czar, agreed to pay $6.2 million and to a two-year ban from associating with any investment adviser or broker-dealer to settle the SEC allegations, the SEC said Thursday.

Separately, Cuomo's office filed two lawsuits against Rattner, seeking at least $26 million and an immediate lifetime ban from the securities industry.

"Steve Rattner was willing to do whatever it took to get his hands on pension fund money including paying kickbacks, orchestrating a movie deal, and funneling campaign contributions," said Cuomo, who is the incoming governor of New York. "Through these lawsuits, we will recover his ill gotten gains and hold Rattner accountable."

A lawyer for Rattner did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment Thursday.

The complete statement from the New York State Attorney General's office is here. It indicates that this investigation has been going on for three years, meaning that it predates Obama taking office and appointing Rattner to the position. In addition, at the time Rattner left office, several months after first being appointed, public reports were already surfacing about his role in the scandal.

This calls into question what sort of shoddy background checks the administration did in this case, and whether or not that shoddiness might be at play in any other appointments.

It also calls into question the wisdom of the Obama team in creating all these "czar" positions, positions with cabinet-level authority, but not subject to the same senate confirmation processes as actual cabinet members. Had the confirmation process gone forward, as envisioned by the framers, we might not have had, even for a short time, a man in charge of the auto companies who is now squarely implicated in a major scandal.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bailout; crook; crool; czars; demirat; gm; obama; rattner; scoundrel

1 posted on 11/18/2010 6:42:46 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The only person in the White House who has ever been vetted is the dog.


2 posted on 11/18/2010 6:45:04 PM PST by G Larry (When you're "RIGHT" you don't look for ways to compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Who else but crooks would have anything to do with this white house, or the dem party of today for that matter.


3 posted on 11/18/2010 6:45:56 PM PST by Carley (WE SAW NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

Ask me if I am surprised.

The President wasn’t vetted, why should anyone expect his czars to be.


4 posted on 11/18/2010 6:47:24 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/17/vetoing-the-veto/?page=1


5 posted on 11/18/2010 6:56:10 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Hey, Rattner made little Barry O feel like he was back home in Chicago with Tony Rezko.


6 posted on 11/18/2010 7:31:37 PM PST by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
What about the Vetting Process?

Sorry, that's a Gummint Motors brand, too....


7 posted on 11/18/2010 7:49:58 PM PST by Hunton Peck (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer; All
Looks like 33 of 44 of Obama's czar appointments faced Senate confirmation.

It's interesting the whole notion of czars in our executive seemed to come from… (shock, shock! surprise surprise!) FDR. He had about a dozen.

Reagan had 1, a drug czar.

While Clinton had 8, it looks like W exploded the number to over 30, many focused on post-9/11 tasks.

Obama has nearly 40 czars. It's insane.

8 posted on 11/18/2010 8:50:01 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Steve Rattner is a CROOK...PERIOD!!


9 posted on 11/19/2010 3:04:42 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson