Posted on 11/18/2010 5:01:45 PM PST by jazusamo
President Obama and his friends in the media want the public to think Americans serving in uniform are just fine and dandy with homosexual conduct in the military. This view is being spread through a series of selective leaks from the Pentagon's Comprehensive Review Working Group, which is putting the finishing touches on a report regarding the future of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
Mr. Obama has promised the fringe special-interest activists who helped him win the 2008 election that he will deliver what for them is the symbolic victory of opening barracks to lesbians, gays, bisexuals and the transgendered (LGBT). Last week, the Supreme Court rejected an attempt to use the courts to bypass the legislative process to implement this radical change. After the big GOP win in the elections, ramming the LGBT priority through the lame-duck Congress appears to be the sole remaining option - and an unlikely one at that.
To improve the odds, anonymous sources have been claiming to the administration's newsroom allies that 70 percent of troops wouldn't object to overturning the long-standing ban on homosexual conduct, citing draft versions of the Pentagon survey. The spin makes it sound as if the troops are fully behind Mr. Obama's campaign pledge.
Those who know better say this reporting has created a false impression. "I looked very closely at the stories," working group co-chairman Jeh C. Johnson wrote in an Oct. 30 e-mail obtained by The Washington Times. "It seemed obvious to me that whoever spoke to the press was not very familiar with the actual results...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Bogus survey. Then lying about bogus survey. They want to push mentally ill sex perverts into the military to destroy morality, create chaos and destroy the military. And the majority of those serving in the military DO NOT WANT THEM IN!
BUMP your informative post.
Yep! Still got two of them under roof. Home school.
Actually, we still work on all of them in various ways. Two have families of their own. We don't interfere with their family life, but Ol' Grandpa still gets a word in when he thinks it's necessary. Ha!
We now work on yet another generation. We have one granddaughter born with NKH. She's 3 years-old now and can't do much but love on us when we hold her. Every drop of slobber is love potion.
But this is infiltrating in all corners of society-not just the military. If you say anything at work you stand a very good chance of being fired or sued. We live in a country where we no longer have free speech regardless of how we keep quoting the Constitution.
Personally, I cannot see how my son could defend a nation where you are not allowed to fire the first shot or shoot back at those who are shooting at you. Worst, our corrupt society now will prosecute our servicemen who dare to punch a terrorist. We use to call these kinds of people “sitting ducks”.
We have gone beyond the tipping point of etiquette. If we do not stand up and start speaking out, the free nation we knew will be a distance memory and the Constitution another scrap of paper.
Push-polling is the term of art.
Plus leaking, and lying leakers, and homopolemicalpseudojournalistic tripe masquerading as news. Same old same-old. The Homoleft has been lying and falsifying things since the original Evelyn Hooker study in 1957 that patsy Hooker let some of her subjects hustle her on. They spun the data and basically rendered her report useless, except as (their) propaganda.
People of the Lie really does describe them.
“Opposition to normalizing sinful behavior is deeply rooted in our theology, and that opposition will come to a sharp head if the armed forces compel affirmation of homosexual conduct.”
There it is. The Black Grail of the homosexual movement: Official persecution of the Churches and believing Christians and Jews who abominate homosexuality in obedience to the moral commandment of their God.
Now it's on everywhere, and the real issue finally comes to the fore.
ALL of the straight people will leave.......then we will have a DRAFT, which is what the DEMS WANT!! GIRLS WILL BE DRAFTED ALSO!!
Thanks for giving us the real story. I’m weary of all the propaganda out there.
Thank you for speaking out.
the father of lies has been building this disconnect from the Truth for generations now, institutionally i dont think we have much of a chance now, short of a God Given great awakening/revival...as it stands, we are pretty much locked into waiting for the 'time' to come, to roll over or fight...
Christs body, made of many parts, is designed to take much abuse...the minority of said parts have a 'pushback' function...most are willing to suffer quietly in the assurance that all this is temporal...
itll take cattlecars to stir the hornets nest, if ever...
How many trained ex-military do you imagine are out in the private sector? We have recently trained (last fifteen to twenty years) retired military who are Christians, who will not bow to the father of lies or his democrat progressive sycophants.
“You are the second military Freeper that I have seen that has said that about the questionnaire. Wish I could remember who else said it. Maybe LJ remembers.”
As a reservist, I was tagged to take it as well. The survey was not about how I felt about repealing DADT, but how to implement it just as the editorial stated. It was a very distasteful thing to not be able to clearly articulate my strong objections to allowing open homosexuals. Like the previous poster said, there was one little comments box. I am sure any negative comments were ignored.
As the editorial stated, I am deeply concerned that the repeal of DADT, with subsequent implementations, will force anyone with moral objections out of military service.
Which is more likely to be a well disciplined and well behaved soldier....(1) Someone with high morals (2) Someone with no morals? The person with high morals is more likely to be a well disciplined and behaved soldier that will help build a cohesive military with respect for authority. Take them away and you risk constructing a military that is nothing more than an armed rabble. Remove those with morals from the military and you will have increased cases of abuse of authority, rapes, sexual harrassment, and just plain misconduct. A person without morals is more likely to commit war crimes, etc.
So, are we going to throw out a moral majority for an immoral extremely small minority? Insanity.
I believe that it was you I was thinking of. Thank you for responding!
Perhaps that’s the whole idea. Degrade the US military by getting the volunteers to walk.
Amen
You are absolutely correct, lentulsgracchus.
Everyone should The Pink Swastika for history and deeper understanding of all things “gay”. And recently I posted a serious of three articles from the Canada Free Press about the history of the modern “gay rights” movement - joined at the hip with communism, especially Harry Hay, who is sort of the “father” of “gay rights” and of course, NAMBLA.
A huge BTTT which everyone should read.
obviously CHRISTians are guided by more than human 'law' and there isnt anything in the training to demand action until the situation is 'bow' or die...
the evil one knows this and will try to remain subtle enuff to avoid this reaction for a while yet...meanwhile the train is gaining speed towards the cliff...past the point of no return ??? time will tell...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.