Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner
Additionally, the purpose of an aircraft carrier is power projection against hostile opposition.

I contend the English, French, Italians, Russians...or any country other than the US and Japan have ever achieved that standard.


There are some Argentine pilots that might dispute the fact that the Royal Navy was unable to do power projection with Harrier carriers. The RN has done power projection with ships who's capabilities are fare less than what the new Japanese flattops will be capable of.
26 posted on 11/18/2010 11:59:08 AM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: GonzoGOP
"And the English, and the French and the Italians and the Russians. And a lot of other countries have a lot of experience with deploying used carriers they got from other countries. Just because you don't consider something 'legitimate' or 'useful' does not mean it does not have strategic significance and tactical utility. "

Yes, against the Argentine Air Force of the 1980s...the Harrier was a match.

27 posted on 11/18/2010 12:01:15 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson