Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dengar01

At current, I “support” Meeks. By “support,” I mean “despise the least.”

We will get nothing - NOTHING - from almost all of these candidates. Meeks is at least Pro-Life, and has lambasted the funding of abortions, etc.

I have settled on the sad fact that Meeks is the “best” candidate in my mind who has a shot at winning. The only thing we’ll get from him is an actively Pro-Life Mayor; still, that one thing is one more thing than we’ll get from anyone else running - and guys like Rahm will use the office to punish people they don’t like. I fear folks who will start writing their own enemies list from the moment they get elected.

There are no good choices who can win- absolutely none. But I’d rather get one thing than nothing.


16 posted on 11/18/2010 9:02:13 AM PST by TitansAFC ("Mike Pence's Amnesty plan is the '86 Amnesty with a trip home tacked on." - The Heritage Foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TitansAFC
Well thanks for the information. As you know the black vote is huge and we have three black candidates as of now. If Meeks is pro life that is an important thing because we know Danny Davis and Carol Mosley Fraud is pro abortion.

As far as Rahm goes even if allowed to run I find it highly likely he'll win. He won Blago's seat but honestly I never heard of him before he ran for Blago's seat.

The sad thing is the average IQ of a Chicago voter is about as low is it goes. It is all about bribing voters with cigarettes and booze.

23 posted on 11/18/2010 9:12:19 AM PST by Dengar01 (Go Blackhawks!!! Go Bears!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson