To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ugh... I don’t mind people stating their opinion about the possibility or impossibility of a candidate to win. After all, good people might have different opinion on whether a candidate will win or not. Saying that she’s only in for money, however, is beyond low because he’s introducing a motive that nobody can verify but Palin. Since he is paid by for-profit company, I’ll say that he just make controversial statement for money.
7 posted on
11/18/2010 4:52:54 AM PST by
paudio
(The differences between Clinton and 0bama? About a dozen former Democratic Congressmen.)
To: paudio
Ugh... I dont mind people stating their opinion about the possibility or impossibility of a candidate to win. After all, good people might have different opinion on whether a candidate will win or not. Saying that shes only in for money, however, is beyond low because hes introducing a motive that nobody can verify but Palin. Interesting. Wasn't the take by FReepers just after she resigned that she was leaving office to earn money to pay her legal bills. Also, the consensus was "If she's doing it for the money, good for her. She deserves it."
25 posted on
11/18/2010 5:13:13 AM PST by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: paudio
"...good people might have different opinion on whether a candidate will win or not." Yeah, but I thought we were talking about Scarborough...?
8^D
61 posted on
11/18/2010 6:07:50 AM PST by
Gargantua
(I prefer a Shitake reduction with butter, sauterne, a pinch of basil and balsamic)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson