To: NormsRevenge
It was a milk factory. No, wait...........
2 posted on
11/17/2010 4:27:00 PM PST by
Paladin2
They did get a conviction on one charge, he ain’t going anywhere.
3 posted on
11/17/2010 4:27:04 PM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
To: NormsRevenge
What happens when you put one of America’s enemies on trial in front of a jury of America-hating Manhattanites.
4 posted on
11/17/2010 4:28:37 PM PST by
Thane_Banquo
(Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
To: NormsRevenge
What is 0bama and Holder going to do with this guy when he gets out jail in a few months? If he cannot be deported because no other country wants him, what American city will be his new home? How much will he collect in welfare benefits?
5 posted on
11/17/2010 4:28:45 PM PST by
forgotten man
(forgotten man)
To: NormsRevenge
The jury was tampered with, when eleven says guilty, one says not guilty. Money or intimidation bought that twelfth one.
Check his bank account in six months.
8 posted on
11/17/2010 4:30:32 PM PST by
Doulos1
(Bitter Clinger Forever!)
To: NormsRevenge
The first suspect transferred from Guantanamo military prison to face a U.S. civilian court was found not guilty of terrorism charges on Wednesday in a setback to President Barack's (sic) Obama plans for trying terrorism suspects. How in the hell does Reuters figure that this is a setback for Obama's "plans for trying terrorism suspects"?
This is exactly what he and Holder wanted!
10 posted on
11/17/2010 4:32:24 PM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
To: NormsRevenge
...gov had 46 witnesses,hundreds of exhibits.......
defense spoke for 20 mins...no witnesses
jury deliberated for seven days......
and rats say their “happy” with outcome....
11 posted on
11/17/2010 4:32:36 PM PST by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: NormsRevenge
...found not guilty of terrorism charges on Wednesday in a setback to President Barack's Obama plans for trying terrorism suspects From Obama's perspective this is not a setback at all. This is the type of outcome he and Holder wanted all along.
To: NormsRevenge
The important thing here is a jury in a civilian court can be stacked and the person can be set free. A good reason for a military court. It’s just starting folks.
15 posted on
11/17/2010 4:36:02 PM PST by
RC2
To: NormsRevenge
If he was part of the conspiracy, how can he not be guilty of the results of that conspiracy? The jury must have spent that week with medical marijuana.
16 posted on
11/17/2010 4:38:57 PM PST by
kingu
(Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
To: NormsRevenge
17 posted on
11/17/2010 4:43:03 PM PST by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: NormsRevenge
Impeach Obama!!! Fire Holder!!! Traitors, both of them!!!
To: NormsRevenge
The jury found him guilty of one relatively minor charge of conspiracy to damage or destroy U.S. property with explosives.
Minor charge? I heard the sentence could be 20 years to life.
21 posted on
11/17/2010 5:01:05 PM PST by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: NormsRevenge
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
