To have a discourse, people must have an agreement on basic principles. Most agree to adhere to logic. Post #20 is demonstrably not a personal attack: it analyzed point by point not you as a person but what you said. And, most of the post actually defends your position, as I understood that position to be.
"You just proved my point. No substance. All belittling and demeaning anyone who dares comment outside of your process zone. Its all about destroying humans."
Now I understand you better. By "quants" you actually meant not those who know and use mathematics but those who adhere to logic. You posit further that (i) logic is at odds with humanity, (ii) whatever illogical rants you chose to emit, people must accept them as valid, since they are "human," and, (iii) anyone disagreeing with these suppositions " destroy[s] humans."
Your posts demonstrate how far relativism has reached: a supposedly conservative person demands the acceptance of logical and illogical as equivalent.
Sorry I troubled you with my replies. It will not happen again, April.
Must have last word. Must have last word. Must have last word.....