Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

This is a continuation of the National School Lunch Program with changes intended to make the school lunches healthier. As a professional in the industry, I agree with some of the bill, have issues with some parts.

This is one area of the budget where the benefit ratio is very high. Low administrative costs as most of the funds in the NSLP are spent on food, not bloated federal salaries. All food dollars must be spent on US products.


16 posted on 11/16/2010 10:41:23 AM PST by Maryland Man (NOW is the time for conservatives to rise up!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Maryland Man

That’s nonsense.

How much does it cost do buy a few loves of bread and some peanut butter? How much does it cost to buy a couple of dozen eggs? How much does it cost to put some vegetables on the table and some cheap beef? How much does it cost to put some fresh fruit on the table?

The real problem is that parents are not tending to their own children. Lets face it. Lets deal with it.

It doesn’t cost thousands of dollars per month to feed your family. Those of us who spent part of our lives having to scrape buy, somehow found ways to make sure our kids ate well. And somehow we did it without government programs.

You talk about bang for the buck. It’s my buck asshole.

If parents refuse to take care of their children, put the children in a safe environment where they can thrive.


20 posted on 11/16/2010 10:49:42 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Your next chance like this? About 2044. Vote popularity and don't waste time with the details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson