Replies

I understand this..but it is nonsense to give raises to keep up with inflation. This is no different than subsidizing industries. It is another entitlement which the employee is obliged to give rather than the determination to award those who are productive. If one feels the crunch in a "pay cut" because the cost of living has risen, then they need to consider what they can do to change this equation...put out more and ask what the requirements are which the management wants to see in order to compete and earn more. Otherwise...move on to another company who does reward performance.

So you're OK with believing that your pay is in fact the same as long as the NUMBER is the same, even if the cost of goods has gone up, and having to work more, harder, or smarter to eat, dress and drive the same as last year?? Whatever. I figure if I produce more I'm entitled to consume more. That would seem to just be common sense.

Yes, I am ok with that, even if costs go up. It is my responsibility to change that equation not the government to require employers to subsidize cost of living. Employers should be able to determine what they pay and when they determine pay raises as well as how much. If an individual doesn't like what he's paid then it's his responsibility to move on to a company more favorable to what he desires or get the requirements under his belt which would bring a more favorable result. If I am not paid a fair wage as I see it then it's time to go elswhere.

I figure if I produce more I'm entitled to consume more.

"entitled?" ....there it is. If you produce more and are not rewarded for doing so...move on to someone else who recognizes your contribution and is willing to compensate you for that. Otherwise adjust your spending habits to your means. Entitled....nope.