Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Paycheck Unfairness Act (FReepers - CALL!)
Townhall ^ | November 16, 2010 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 11/16/2010 10:12:16 AM PST by FreeManDC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 11/16/2010 10:12:20 AM PST by FreeManDC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

Equal worth? So a Phoenix freight company will be forced to pay the data entry woman sitting in an air conditioned office the same as the drug tested, FBI investigated, CDL certified truck driver handling heavy freight in a 140 degree trailer?


2 posted on 11/16/2010 10:17:14 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

I’m really getting sick of this crap. So here goes...

I say that to make it fair, when men and women have jobs where there’s any physical requirement, the men should make more money! How’s that? For instance, I know a guy who’s a nurse at a phych hospital, and he’s huge and extremely in shape. A very big guy. Well, guess who they always want to be there when there’s dangerous patients being dealt with? Yeah, that’s who. Mister “I make the same as a 99 lb female nurse!”


3 posted on 11/16/2010 10:19:44 AM PST by RingerSIX (Better dead than red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RingerSIX

The way it was originally proposed would have required multi-state companies to pay the same regardless of location. It was aimed at making Right to Work states less appealing than union controlled states. I suspect that someone figured out that the companies would move all their jobs to the lower cost states, rather than what they wanted.


4 posted on 11/16/2010 10:24:59 AM PST by Ingtar (If Washington and his peers had been RINOs, we would still be a British colony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

Marxist ideology has never worked, always has created mass deaths and poverty. Free markets and Capitalism are the only way to create a free and wealthy society. Employers have the right to set wages and people have the right to accept or decline. Minimum wage is Marxist and should end because it only creates more poverty and takes rights away from the employer. Governments should not be running their businesses and making their decisions. It is what has ruined all socialist countries. Get government OUT of the work place. It is unconstitutional in this country.


5 posted on 11/16/2010 10:25:03 AM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC
Anti-discrimination laws of any kind aimed at private persons or companies—as opposed to government entities—are fascistic.

Such laws are designed as poisonous solutions to non-problems. If someone doesn't want to pay you what you're worth, he's stupid. Go work for someone smarter and out-compete the bigoted company. Problem solved, and—so sorry!—no employment opportunity created for busybody regulators or ambulance chasers.

6 posted on 11/16/2010 10:27:54 AM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC
Pure red idiocy designed to gum up the system and destroy jobs.

If the left were REALLY worried about women, they'd be against the Muslims. They'd close the Mexican border so that OTM’s don't come in. They'd express a little outrage instead of misguided PC tolerance at the Muslim terrorists.

Instead, they say, “Let's kill a few more jobs while the economy is in the toilet!”

Geniuses.

7 posted on 11/16/2010 10:31:33 AM PST by PATRIOT1876 (Language, Borders, Culture, Full employment for those here legally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: TopGun25

I went through this in the 1980’s. The secretaries thought they should be paid the same as the technicians. Job swapping for a day didn’t go they way they planned.


10 posted on 11/16/2010 10:48:14 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: FreeManDC

The law is a trainwreck. What a great parting gift for conservative control of the House!

Here will be a major unreported impact of the law. The major tool for increased compensation in the private sector and some parts of the government sector is competing job offers. An employer who makes or responds to a competing job offer may be in violation of this law however. This strategy requires mobility so I believe that men can more often take advantage of this strategy. Employers may be forced into increasing salaries of women employees if they want to hire or retain male talent. Employers will most likely respond by curtailing competing job offers and moving work abroad to seek top talent. This law will increase the cost of top US talent except perhaps for female top talent.


12 posted on 11/16/2010 11:21:23 AM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

Any bill they pass with the words ‘fairness, unfairness, affordable, etc’, watch out!


13 posted on 11/16/2010 11:35:51 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: TopGun25

“A major goal of the feminist manifesto is to downplay and discredit male talent. Their ultimate goal is to take away our jobs and turn the tables.”

They would like to make conservative men submit to lefist women. I do not think that conservative women approve however. Conservative women do not seem to have the same voice because women tend to vote for rats. Control and submission are clearly the goals.


15 posted on 11/16/2010 11:44:39 AM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: FreeManDC

Only looking out for what is best for the country while putting personal gain aside. /s


18 posted on 11/16/2010 3:32:47 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopGun25
And they expect to be pampered?

They don't expect to be pampered because they already are. What they want is to push men around and get their money.

19 posted on 11/16/2010 3:33:54 PM PST by donna (Conservatives believe in God, Family, Country. Not money, money, money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TopGun25
...they’re gonna turn on the liberal men.

There is no such thing as a liberal man.

20 posted on 11/16/2010 3:35:00 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson