Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple iTunes, at Long Last, Gets Rights to Beatles
Wall Street Journal ^ | Nov. 15, 2010 | Ethan Smith

Posted on 11/15/2010 3:46:31 PM PST by re_tail20

Steve Jobs is nearing the end of his long and winding pursuit of the Beatles catalog.

Apple Inc. is preparing to announce that its iTunes Store will soon start carrying music by the Beatles, according to people familiar with the situation, a move that would fill in a glaring gap in the collection of the world's largest music retailer.

The deal resulted from talks that were taking place as recently as last week among executives of Apple, representatives of the Beatles and their record label, EMI Group Ltd,, according to these people. These people cautioned that Apple could change plans at the last minute.

Spokesmen for Apple, EMI and Paul McCartney declined to comment. Apple on Monday posted a notice on the home page of its iTunes Store that it would make "an exciting announcement" Tuesday morning. The agreement would represent a watershed in a fraught, decades-long relationship between two of the biggest icons in their respective fields. The two sides have traded lawsuits since 1978, when the Beatles alleged that the computer maker, then known as Apple Computer, infringed on the band's trademark. That's because the Beatles in 1968 created a wholly owned entity called Apple Corps Ltd., that acted as an arts-promotion company and owned Apple Records. Though EMI retained ownership of the Beatles recordings, the Apple logo was printed on their albums.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: applebeatles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: re_tail20

Real geniuses, these people who hold the Beatles rights. Their refusal to grant the rights to download LEGALLY for so long means that people have been downloading them for FREE for the past 10 years.

Way to move into the 21st century dudes!


41 posted on 11/15/2010 9:37:23 PM PST by packrat35 (I got your tag line..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

I suppose the irony is that Beatles purists favor the mono mixes for albums originally issued in mono so any hype about remixes/remastering will be largely wasted.


42 posted on 11/16/2010 4:55:47 AM PST by relictele ( -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

Awesome.
Awesome.
AWESOME.
I hope they get some good bootlegs and studio takes up there, too.


43 posted on 11/16/2010 7:03:57 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
The man is constitutionally incapable of completing a song. If you listen to his stuff for long, you pick up a pattern, that his "songs" are mostly crazy-quilts of ideas, none of which are sufficient to make a song, but string a bunch of them together and it sort of lasts long enough to be called one.

A pretty decent observation, though there are stand-outs, like Yesterday. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that was one of Paul's most noticeable non-John-involvement achievements.

Paul and John also squashed George Harrison for far too long. Sure, All Things Must Pass has some filler, but the metal of that album would've worked out magnificently under the Beatles brand.

44 posted on 11/16/2010 7:12:13 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
> there are stand-outs, like Yesterday. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that was one of Paul's most noticeable non-John-involvement achievements.

I agree. "Yesterday" is a monumental song. I've performed it (singing over solo guitar accompaniment) and it affects me tremendously. Very powerful tune.

It's no coincidence that when Lennon tweaked McCartney about the changes in the breakup, he used "Yesterday" as the example of how good Paul used to be.

45 posted on 11/16/2010 7:34:41 AM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
I've performed it (singing over solo guitar accompaniment) and it affects me tremendously. Very powerful tune.

Nice! One of my favorite Beatles recordings is from Anthology, I believe, and it's the Yesterday when Paul is instructing the others about the key and chord progression before he jumps into it. Then he just leaps in and it sounds flat-out awesome.

Had the opportunity to see Paul at Fenway a few years back. The dude flat-out still rocks profoundly, and to my great joy, he played a Beatles-heavy set.

46 posted on 11/16/2010 7:52:43 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Didn’t Michael Jackson own the rights or something like that?

Jacko owned the publishing rights -- that is, the songwriter's rights. The rights to the recordings are owned, as they have been since 1968, by Apple Corps.

47 posted on 11/16/2010 10:36:13 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; 537cant be wrong; Aeronaut; ßuddaßudd; bassmaner; Bella_Bru; ...
Senior citizens who remember the Beetles are already lining up in front of the iTunes store downtown.

PING!

48 posted on 11/16/2010 12:26:12 PM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I really liked Macca’s first two solo efforts, “McCartney” and “Ram.” They were experimental, even avant garde in parts, much better than his Wings stuff.

Yes, they are two good ones. Most of McCartney's solo stuff is crap. Check out his Flaming Pie album, though (deleting the Steve Miller stuff). It's as good as anything he ever did.

49 posted on 11/16/2010 5:06:23 PM PST by KevinB (We'll stop treating Obama like a dog when he stops treating us like a fire hydrant - Fred Grandy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
What made Lennon and McCartney work was that both were good filters of the other’s crap.

Yes, Lennon said as much in an interview before he died: That they were each others' BS detectors.

50 posted on 11/16/2010 5:13:43 PM PST by KevinB (We'll stop treating Obama like a dog when he stops treating us like a fire hydrant - Fred Grandy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Paul and John also squashed George Harrison for far too long. Sure, All Things Must Pass has some filler, but the metal of that album would've worked out magnificently under the Beatles brand.

George wrote the best of the Post-Beatles songs, "It Don't Come Easy" for Ringo.

51 posted on 11/16/2010 7:07:23 PM PST by dfwgator (Texas Rangers -Thanks for a great season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

Correction: Apple Corps owns the rights to the later Beatles’ recordings; the earlier material belongs to EMI. According to reports coming out today, one major hurdle in getting the full catalog online was squabbling between the two.

There are also reports that Amazon and Google were in the running, but Apple outbid them.


52 posted on 11/17/2010 9:33:08 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson