Replies

I think the essence of your argument is correct. However, you need to remember priorities. Who cares if there are homosexuals in the house if the house is on fire. Put the fire out first. Then deal with the moral issues. I think it may be too late. After the coming collapse, moral order will be restored by necessity. I think your point is correct. It is immorality that led to the fire. But now is not the time to lecture the kids about playing with matches, it’s time to put out the fire.

Give me a break. The homosexual rights bullshit is just another tool of the Marxist left which is robbing us blind. Robbing us not only of our money, but of our Liberty!!

Resist or die!!

DON’T TREAD ON ME!!

Free Republic is a pro-life, pro-family, pro-liberty constitutional conservative activist web site. Those who cannot live with that should simply stay away!! (saves wear and tear on my zot button - bitterly clinging redneck, Jim)

(Watch list)

I think the essence of your argument is correct. However, you need to remember priorities. Who cares if there are homosexuals in the house if the house is on fire. Put the fire out first. Then deal with the moral issues. I think it may be too late. After the coming collapse, moral order will be restored by necessity. I think your point is correct. It is immorality that led to the fire. But now is not the time to lecture the kids about playing with matches, it’s time to put out the fire.

I have traditional moral beliefs but I think in the case of the Federal Government, it should stay out of such matters. On abortion and marriage and so on like that, it should be silent on those issues, it is there to protect us from enemies, handle foreign policy, promote a road/rail/air/waterway traffic system, handle disputes between the States and a few sundry things like sending up a space shuttle or two.

These issues are best left to the States and/or locals to decide for themselves. I do realize that people are going to do what they are going to do. Homosexuals have always been with us, myself, as long as they keep their sex lives private, as we should all, there wasn't much of a problem. I'm not for homosexual marriage but again, it should not be forced by judicial fiat, it is something that should be done or stopped via the legislative process. Myself, deep inside, the government should stay out of marriage all together, but again, it is for each State to decide and how far to go. I think most libertarians do get a bum rap, many of them I know are not libertines and loose people, they question how far you can go as a government to enforce morals and they stress personal responsibility where if something goes wrong, it is up to the people themselves to be held responsible and accountible. I guess under such conditions, we might have to accept a few states allowing things we don't like whereas there will be other states that would be more traditional.

I think the homosexual community, if some of their members were not flaunting it in everyone's faces mardi gras style, there would be more benign tolerance.