Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daisyjane69
Daisy, kudos for explaining your point: however the influence of Corexita as a sinking agent is simply not important.

Oil in a normal spill contains heavier fractions that cling to the sea floor, as well as the lighter fractions that rise to the surface. The BP spill was not the first one in history to cover some of the sea floor. They all do that.

If the oil spill (either natural or 'Corexitised') had been large enough to cover the entire Gulf floor in a layer an inch thick then we could reasonably expect some impact on spawning. But one molecule of oil for every ~ 400 sq. miles of sea floor has simply negligible impact.

45 posted on 11/15/2010 8:43:57 AM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra

We all know that normal oil spills contain heavier elements. I am not disputing this.

One of the features of Corexia is to take the lighter fractions, that would normally cling to the surface (as you point out) and PUSH them to the ocean floor. Moreover, the amounts of Corexita were in excess of any amounts previously used AND in excess of the amounts authorized by the EPA. This administration used the Gulf as guinea pigs.

From what I understand, it is the enormous blast of Corexita that is causing the sickening human health problems in the Gulf. But I am going to wait for more solid information.


48 posted on 11/15/2010 8:53:13 AM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson