Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx
In general, I thought it very fair.....and positive.

...although it stated she did not & had not belonged to any organized church???
...that's a first for me.....I always thought she had, especially the church someone tried to burn down in Wasilla.

Perhaps she was misquoted.

38 posted on 11/14/2010 6:01:00 PM PST by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Guenevere

“organized church” is misleading. I think that should read “nationally organized denomination”. We have many rural churches that have been around for some time and have healthy attendance that are not affiliated to one of the “major” national or international denominations.


48 posted on 11/14/2010 6:05:54 PM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Guenevere
...although it stated she did not & had not belonged to any organized church??? ...that's a first for me.....I always thought she had, especially the church someone tried to burn down in Wasilla.

To some people (not me, btw) and "organized church" is talking about one with a larger hierarchy that dictates to local churches, such as the Catholics, Methodists, Presbyterians, etc.

I've been a church-goer most of my adulthood but never to one that had to have its doctrine approved by some national or international body.

114 posted on 11/14/2010 6:41:48 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson