Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CriticalJ
I fully support avoiding social issues. The standard reply should be: Let the states decide.

What a load of destructive nonsense.

What are called "social issues" are actually questions of whether or not unalienable, natural, God-given rights will be protected in America.

If states "can decide" them, they're no longer unalienable.

But, in fact, the raison d'etre of government in America, all government, including the national government, is to protect the unalienable rights of the people, all the people, equally.

341 posted on 11/15/2010 4:23:36 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Here it is in black and white: The pinkos went green 'cause they're too yellow to admit they're red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

“What a load of destructive nonsense.”

It’s destructive nonsense to get caught up in social issues when there are so many things that are easier to fix. Lower taxes, cut spending, appointing non-activist judges and so on.

When these are fixed, move on to other issues.

“But, in fact, the raison d’etre of government in America, all government, including the national government, is to protect the unalienable rights of the people, all the people, equally.”

Exactly. That’s why it should stay the hell out of social issues.


505 posted on 11/15/2010 12:59:10 PM PST by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson