Bla bla bla, refute my point; otherwise you're just typing on a keyboard. I see you choose to deflect rather than counter the argument.
That being said, and notwithstanding, all your bla bla bla, and all that, nonetheless, seems to be all you are capable of; you seem to be either unwilling, or outright incompetent to rebut a suitable defense regarding the inconsistancy between the two CBS framegrabs at issue. Perhaps you're either just cluelesss how to make a coherent counterargument (or have too much emotional currency invested to see the weakness of your propositions).
In any event, let the record show: the question has been asked and the debater is non-responsive (except for ad-hominem). As far as the general's opinion, there's virtually as many of those as there are mouths (everybody's got one). Except for one thing: shooting 'em off don't substitute for thinking. And that goes for you too.
Either way: I really couldn't care less what you think. And quite frankly, I'm not even the least curious what you're going to do about what you believe. IF there's something you actually believe that you can do about your opinion.
This is not a philosophical thread. This thread is about the testimony of a Retired General who asserts this was a missile. Has nothing to do with philosophy. It has to do with disproving the generals assertions which you cannot do, so we get your non-related posting on philosophy.
..incompetent to rebut a suitable defense regarding the inconsistancy between the two CBS framegrabs at issue. Perhaps you're either just cluelesss how to make a coherent counterargument (or have too much emotional currency invested to see the weakness of your propositions).
When are you gonna put together a coherent post about the topic ? So you really do not know how to post an image in your post ? You want me to go through all that crap just because you lack basic HTML skills ?