Posted on 11/13/2010 2:55:59 PM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009
Hannity was surprised to hear a famous ex Air Force General tell him “That Is A Missile, Shot From A Submarine!” I quote retired Air Force Lieutenant General Tom McInerney (ex commander of 11th Air Force in Alaska) “I spent 35 years flying fighters, and you can see the guidance system kick in, I have watched that film 10 times, I am absolutely certain that that is not an aircraft, but a sub launch ICBM missile!!!” See the video and judge his words for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LivRJOWrcpA&feature=player_embedded#! I will next post a clickable link.
Buccaneer81’s post was a quote from a novel.
Most aircraft around LAX are taking off or landing and not at altitudes to create contrails.
Bump
Just do a google search.
Just one example:
Iran Test-Fires Sub-to-Surface Missile in Persian Gulf
Aug. 27, 2006
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,210649,00.html
On the days when contrails are visible, I will see half a dozen or more of them simultaneously over Reno, NV. If contrails were visible in the LA area that day there should have been dozen of then visible simultaneously. Yet there is this one and only one visible.
From the movie script, actually.
Whatever that thing was, I’m absolutely, positively 110% it was not an aircraft.
Not if they were off. And they are not telling what caused the problems. It could not be one of six generators in separate compartments.
So was George Stephanopolous who later described the White House and security/military leaders congregating in the War Room during "the flight 800 shootdown."
Everybody knows only one big jet at a time is allowed near LAX airspace. It’s been common knowledge for years.
To repost a comment I made on another thread:
Let’s go through the evidence.
First, we do *not* have the U.S. Government reacting in a panic. A fleet of anti-submarine airplanes did *not* race out of San Diego to the potential launch site. The aircraft carrier helping the cruise ship did *not* divert to race to the area. Obama/Biden were *not* whisked away to safety.
Does this behaviour match an unannounced missile launch by an unknown party, or does it match an optical illusion?
Second, we do *not* have anyone gloating nor complaining about it. We do *not* have Russia angrily reminding us that ICBM launches must by treaty be announced in advance. We do *not* have Chinese news stations proudly announcing a successful test.
Does this behaviour match a missile launch within sight of US land, or does it match an optical illusion?
Third, we do *not* have any indication at all of where the hypothetical missle landed. We do *not* have amateur astronomers reporting “meteor” sightings along the possible track nor announcing a new satellite. We do *not* have reports of unexplained radar sightings. We do *not* have a recovery team scouring the area (any area) where it might have landed.
Does this behaviour match a missile launch which must come down somewhere, or does this behaviour match an optical illusion?
Fourth, we have testimony. NORAD claims it did not detect a missile launch. The FAA says its radar tracks don’t show any unexplained fast-moving objects. The pentagon says none of our forces launched anything and whatever it is isn’t a threat to us. The entire US military has the attitude of “Huh? I don’t show anything, do you?”.
Does this behaviour match a missile launch (possible cover story: “Routine test, nothing to be alarmed about”) or does it match an optical illusion?
Against this, we have a video of an pre-existing contrail. It’s hard to judge the speed of the object creating the contrail — it looks to me like the camera is jittering from the helicopter, and the actual object isn’t moving that quickly.
In short, now that more evidence has come forward, I consider the chance of this being a missile launch about as high as the chance that the mainstream media will announce the religion of the next terrorist.
The Russians are comrade Obama's main ally. Everything he does is meant to appease them.
Old Generals never die. They just follow the contrails in the sky.
So if it is a missle where did it land?
So tell me again what the FAA said minus your adjectives and why would we worry about something we did....and why would China or Russia even care.....
Not true.
“Lunch? I thought you said launch! It sounded like you said launch!”
Is there flights to PHNL from other cities, such as Dallas, Tuscon, Phoenix or Las Vegas. Is there international flights from inland cities?
I’m not a travel agent and I’m not going to track this info down but I don’t think it was a plane.
re: “I’ll gladly supply still images of an airplane contrail, how’s that?”
Thanks for posting that. Very well done and totally debunks the “missle” theory. Well documented with several great pics and includes the physics as well. Again, thanks for your excellent post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.