Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: markomalley
To: markomalley
Okay, first, I originally saw this on my iPhone and thought it said “Bun-happy”.
Second...what about the inalienable right of each and every teenage San Franciscan to get a Prince Albert? This oppression will not stand.
68 posted on
11/12/2010 2:14:54 PM PST by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: markomalley
And who still thinks that “progressives” and Nazis (national socialists) are not “birds of a feather”?
70 posted on
11/12/2010 2:41:09 PM PST by
Wuli
To: markomalley
To: markomalley
I strongly oppose circumcision, but this is just more fascism from the “we know better” crowd.
77 posted on
11/13/2010 11:58:09 AM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
To: markomalley
The reason why they want to ban it is because men without a Circumcision have a much higher rate of HIV. Thier goal (radical lefty gays) is to have a much higher rate of transfer.
78 posted on
11/13/2010 5:05:15 PM PST by
Scythian
To: markomalley
Wouldn’t this qualify as discrimination against Jews?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
