Overwhelming support for NOT sticking it to the taxpayers, but the liberals are all still asleep so any no votes would be appreciated
To: from occupied ga
99% “no” i love it. bet they do it anyway.
2 posted on
11/12/2010 4:33:04 AM PST by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: from occupied ga
...standard operating proceedure among NFL owners is to do whatever it takes to get public money....no matter how much it costs in the form of advertising/bribes/kickbacks ect. it’s worth it to them to do it...just watch...Arthur Blank will unleash a massive spending campaign to get this done....even if it’s voted down in a referendum, the Falcons will pay off city council to get it over turned.
To: from occupied ga
It’s time for government corruption and favoritism to end.
5 posted on
11/12/2010 4:45:10 AM PST by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: from occupied ga
This is why I no longer watch professional sports. As much as I love to listen to Rush Limbaugh, his affection for the Steelers and the NFL is misguided. As a Pennsylvania taxpayer, I deeply resent the blackmailing of the state by the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh teams to get us to build them new stadiums.
Of course if Gov. Ridge had had any guts, he would have said, “Don’t let the door hit you on the ass.”
Study after study shows that building expensive sports stadiums does nothing to reverse urban decay.
To: from occupied ga
Blank voted YES.
Everybody else voted NO! ! ! ! ! ! !
7 posted on
11/12/2010 5:00:50 AM PST by
DeaconRed
(I sold all my Gold and bought lead. . . Lots of lead. . . .)
To: from occupied ga
Thanks for pointing out this article and the poll. Add another “NO” vote to the list! If pro sports are supposed to be such great sources of revenue, they can pay for their own stadiums!
12 posted on
11/12/2010 5:09:49 AM PST by
GizmosAndGadgets
(That given freely is charity; Taken by force, theft; Stolen by the government, tyranny.)
To: from occupied ga
I voted no.
The Georgia Dome was built in 1992 so the stadium is 18 years old. How does its age compare with other NFL venues?
Blank has been trying to get a MLS soccer team franchise for Atlanta.
15 posted on
11/12/2010 5:36:02 AM PST by
Padams
To: from occupied ga
Atlanta is BROKE!!! Imagine that!
To: from occupied ga
Great win for the Falcons last night, but NO here.
17 posted on
11/12/2010 5:49:04 AM PST by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing leftists and their fellow Defeatists want.)
To: from occupied ga
I don’t see why the teams shouldn’t pay for their own stadiums and cut the pay for their overgrown boys on the teams
18 posted on
11/12/2010 5:50:18 AM PST by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: from occupied ga
The NFL believes that a new stadium could bring the Falcons a superbowl. How about a winning team instead?
21 posted on
11/12/2010 6:16:18 AM PST by
meyer
(Hey Obama - It's the end of the world as you know it.... ..... and I feel fine!)
To: from occupied ga
This really kills me - they pulled this stunt in Cleveland, Ohio in the late 1980's. They hoodwinked the county taxpayers into funding a new baseball stadium despite the old one being structurally sound and functional. They also used taxpayer funds to build a new downtown arena despite there being a PRIVATELY-FUNDED 21,000 seat arena in nearby Richfield, Ohio that served as a basketball and hockey arena for years and did so without any taxpayer money. The city of Cleveland basically forced the Richfield colosium to close, and did so with money stolen from taxpayers.
Then, to top all that, they bent the law to allow them to later use the same taxpayer funds to build a new football stadium, this time without voter approval. They decided that it was OK to misappropriate funds that were designated for the baseball stadium to build a football stadium so that the new Browns could have a place to play (and lose repeatedly).
My take - with the enormous sums of money that these teams have to pay out to players, they can easily afford to build their own playpens rather than have the taxpayers financially raped to build them. The money should come SOLELY from the teams and any donors that feel the need to help finance another useless sports facility.
22 posted on
11/12/2010 6:31:33 AM PST by
meyer
(Hey Obama - It's the end of the world as you know it.... ..... and I feel fine!)
To: from occupied ga
On a side note, Harrah’s (the casino chain that coerced their employees to vote for Harry Reid in the recent election) is currently pushing a local initiative to get an arena built on their property in Las Vegas. It would be paid for by an increase in Nevada taxes and an increase in tourist taxes. They are presenting the plan under the guise of it it being a way to create jobs and to attract a National Basketball Association team, and/or a National Hockey League team, but they don't want to pay for it themselves. They want others to pick up the tab while they profit off of it.
24 posted on
11/12/2010 6:50:34 AM PST by
Nevadan
To: from occupied ga; 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; all the best; ...
If it’s so worthwhile, let the Falcon’s owners do it!
Link to poll: http://wsbradio.com/localnews/2010/11/wsb-poll-75.html
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!***
FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list.
And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin’, if I miss them.
(looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
29 posted on
11/13/2010 4:19:09 PM PST by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson