Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jackson57

What if the dot over the “i” in “Murkowski” is unclear? Is it a dot? Is it a smudge? It is, in fact, an “e?” I think you have to give a little leeway. Lisa M? No. Lisa Murkowsky? Yes.


21 posted on 11/11/2010 7:01:53 AM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree (If not for the double standard, liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TruthShallSetYouFree

“Lisa M? No. Lisa Murkowsky? Yes.”

Alaskan election law according to New Jersey’s TruthShallSetYouFree. Now, I wonder what that AK law says Truth? Shall we consult Alaskan law on the matter and let them decide based on that - or not?

Perhaps they’ll rule that the ‘i’ or the ‘y’ is the “spirit of the law.” But let THEM rule on it according to AK law, and let us not opine against the levying of that very election law.


29 posted on 11/11/2010 7:06:38 AM PST by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chron. 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

Where do you draw the line? What is “close enough”? And what are the qualifications to make that call? At some point, according to your logic, someone is going to be disenfranchised when the line is drawn.


41 posted on 11/11/2010 7:12:58 AM PST by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson