[TruthShallSetYouFree]

You are trying to steal the vote for Murkowsky and give it to Murkowski.

Even if Murkowsky doesn't exist?

[Smokeyblue]

The voter voted for “Murkowsky” a non-qualified write-in candidate. Not “Murkowski” a qualified write-in candidate.

This is why the Alaskan law is clear that the spelling must be correct. No exceptions.

You’re a thief giving Murkowsky’s votes to Murkowski.

Your games are lame.

[SeattleBruce]

“Even if Murkowsky doesn’t exist?”

If a RINO is felled in the primary hunt, but lies and goes back on her word, does she really exist? Even the ‘i’ version? Oh, the LIE version exists to be sure.

MurkowskLIE - that’s how the write-ins should be required to vote for the existing RINO.

[trappedincanuckistan]

How do you know someone didn’t write “Murkowsky” as a protest vote knowing it wouldn’t be counted?