Posted on 11/11/2010 12:55:19 AM PST by FTJM
An attorney-doctor from Kansas whose brother is scheduled for a court-martial says President Obama could, if he chose, resolve the dispute virtually without effort.
Greg Lakin, whose brother is Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, told talk radio show host Peter Boyles on KHOW radio in Denver that it would be "easy."
"It could have been an easy fix. Obama could have stepped up and done the honorable thing and made this all go away," Greg Lakin said in the interview this week. "Just some type of showing, 'Hey, I was born here … here's some proof.'"
WND reported a new trial date has been announced by the military for Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, the career Army doctor who decided to refuse an assignment to Afghanistan because of his concern that the orders he was issued in a chain of command headed by Barack Obama were not legal.
According to attorney Neal Puckett, who has represented Lakin since a military judge ordered Lakin could not have access to any information about President Obama's eligibility, the trial is scheduled to begin Dec. 14 and run for three days.
He confirmed to WND that there will be new directions for the defense but could not elaborate.
"All I can really say is the case is going to be handled differently from here on out," he said.
Greg Lakin said he fears the military, which he said never has had to confront the possibility that a president may not be eligible and his orders then may be illegitimate, may take the easy way out and simply lock up his brother.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
ROTFLMAO. So it was unlawful because you say it was. Well why didn't you say that to begin with?
Sarcasm tag? Not when describing you...and no pun intended.
No VI. It is called pack on the scurrilous charges - to hang Lakin with other BS when they want to avoid the real issue, which is Obama is not able to issue lawful orders.
I did tell you, but you were too busy being the VI.
"What part do you think?" and "If you can think?'
was an appropriate response to your question.
From someone who hasn't read the judge's decision yeah.
Ah, so the charges are scurrilous - or phoney or bogus or any other adjective you care to use - because you say they are? Thanks for clearing that up for us.
And who would that be? You? Go back to post #130 for the answer.
Then I suggest you contact Leo Donofrio and argue that line with him.
Article I, Section 1 is quoted in its entirety below. I noticed right away the statement, “legislative Powers”, which are the sole responsibility of Congress (Judges love to ignore that one!) but that does not preclude Congress from delegating authority to try a usurper in the district court in which the usurpers office resides. It precludes Congress from delegating the Power to create legislation to another body.
Article I, Section 1: All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.
(U.S. Constitution)
Congress is solely responsible for removing a President using impeachment. A usurper occupies the Presidency illegally and cannot be impeached. Quo Warranto is the legal challenge to prove eligibility for office and that authority to deal with a usurper President has been delegated to the District Court of Washington, D.C.
Big deal? Is that supposed to mean anything significant? LOL!
No one will touch it - there was an article - each judge ruled like the previous. Retired military brass have spoken openly about it. And not that it’s ridiculous that you and others may say - they say the opposite - they aren’t wusses.
W/o the BC - he’s still not natural born. If you don’t think everyone knows this, you are wrong. Imagine that, the libs know more than you.
That was an answer?
Yes VI, scurrilous charges when the establishment wants to avoid the real issue that Obama is a Usurper who cannot give lawful orders.
Here is an example that you may understand. You remember Scooter Libby right? The guy who was Chief of Staff for VP Dick Cheney.
What charge and conviction did that disingenuous DA from Chicago get him on? I'll give you a clue instead of playing 10 posts with you claiming ignorance. Fitzgerald who could not get Scouter Libby on the trumpeted charge of outing that faux spy Plame, but had to resort to BS "process charges" that Libby "lied" to FBI investigators over time.
As like Fitzgerald, the Army won't address the the real issue so they resort to other scurrilous charges. Of course my example is likely way over a VI's head.
Like I said in post 151 - you like to play ignorance.
Then I suggest you Quo Warranto your heart out.
Hussein will be prez until January 2013.
Well maybe they just need to step aside and let you take over? </sarcasm>
Unlike you, who practices it with every post you make. You're a pro at it by now.
That I seriously doubt.
He’s sending money to personal bank accounts in Dubai.
He has spent $23Million (or our tax money) on helping Kenya write a new national constitution. That constitution now allows for someone like himself to run for the office of President of Kenya.
Does that sound like someone who intends on sticking around?
It’s a golden opportunity for your Obama to put his eligibility issue to rest. It is the morally right thing to do, but will he do that?
The answer is no.
Au contraire, anyone who looks at this thread will see you're the best at it.
Well that's a damned stupid question, but considering the source....
The answer is no.
The answer is actually 'hell no', but where have you been right so far?
You're much too modest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.