Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C210N
Letting both “winners” vote is somewhat like Solomon giving half the baby to each of the “winning” moms. Furthermore, it changes the vote stealing to one of trying to make sure you wind up within that magic 1 or 2% trigger.

Think about it just a tiny bit, even if the dems were to steal their way into such a tie here and there, far less damage would have been done and would only consist of a 53% majority losing its ability to disenfranchise the other 47% or something like that.

As I see it, we need to either get this stuff straight somehow or other or split the country up. The system at present is barely working.

18 posted on 11/11/2010 4:04:17 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: wendy1946
far less damage would have been done ...

Here in MA, we seem to always be on that 47% side (or, perhaps mostly in the 40% side). It just seems to me the 53% is made up not just of voters, but of a good percentage of droners. That is, drones who vote. We can write tons of logical LTEs, win sign wars, clearly win debates, call, robo-call, door knock, call and then call some more, and then the other guy, a sleaze bag gets in because those droners won't, don't (or can't) listen to reason. On the can't listen to reason, I recently checked out a talk by Evan Sayet of "How Liberals Think", which makes a pretty solid case that you can reason during a campaign till the cows come home, but those cows are droners.

23 posted on 11/11/2010 4:57:18 AM PST by C210N (0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson