You can’t possibly believe that. Ninety eight percent? If that doesn’t SCREAM fraud for you, there is no hope.
It really does sound fishy. I wonder how many of the voters had the same names as the Dallas Cowboys starting lineup, and names like Mickey Mouse and Superman? And how many were even alive?
Why is it strange that Murkowski got 98% of write-ins? Normally write-ins get less than 1% of thd vote in Alaska. This year it was 40%. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure the difference is Murkowski.
Joe Miller is already on the ballot. Who is going to write him in?
Look, I want Joe to somehow pull this out and I loathe Murky for what she's done, but it's over for him. The good news is that Murkowski will have no real power in the Senate. She will be essentially a freshman again.
they went thru over 80,000 write ins just starting today?.....don’t think so......
Actually, if we’re discussing write-ins, it could very easily be that lopsided. The more viable the write in candidate was, the more lopsided it would be.
Do you disagree?
yup fraud.
>>> Ninety eight percent? If that doesn’t SCREAM fraud for you, there is no hope.
No it doesn’t scream fraud. Honestly how could it be otherwise? Miller was on the regular ballot. There is no reason to write him in. Conversely this was the ONLY way Lisa’s supporters could vote for her, so nearly all would be her votes.
With that many votes for a real candidate the % of crank votes would be reduced as a proportion.